Bug 1618287 Comment 0 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
Part of [Design](https://docs.google.com/document/d/11iAbml3EOyE8jxsB0-NLfxLWoDzIq-jCKJHAwLnM7z0/edit#heading=h.ag9hjgvwpoz4) documentation for rel=preload

Please follow the [PreloaderBase class](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oH9-zfrnbw08BndhHUfR7MmEKDcIUqhjUpTYAdYq1Pg/edit#heading=h.bkf95sr4n0xw) design notes.

The class is intended to be derived from and then registered in dom::Document.PreloadService under a key.  Main usage is by resource loaders (script, style, ...) and is a basic coalescing block for the new preload implementation in DOM.
Revision 1 by
on 
Part of [Design](https://docs.google.com/document/d/11iAbml3EOyE8jxsB0-NLfxLWoDzIq-jCKJHAwLnM7z0/edit#heading=h.ag9hjgvwpoz4) documentation for rel=preload

Please follow the [PreloaderBase class](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oH9-zfrnbw08BndhHUfR7MmEKDcIUqhjUpTYAdYq1Pg/edit#heading=h.bkf95sr4n0xw) design notes.

The class is intended to be derived from and then registered in dom::Document.PreloadService under a key.  Main usage is by resource loaders (script, style, ...) and is a basic coalescing block for the new preload implementation in DOM.

There is no need to implement the "use timeout" mechanism in this bug, specifically the two `NotifyOpen` and `NotifyUsage` methods, there is bug 1618921 filed for that.

Back to Bug 1618287 Comment 0