Bug 1623291 Comment 1 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
I found two regression ranges here and I don’t know what's the expected behavior:

Regression range when good build crashes the browser and bad build redirects the user to a blank page:
Last good revision: 6453222232be364fb8ce3fd29b6cbcd480e5f2e3 (2018-11-29)
First bad revision: 950f6d29da967b9999ce709e94bf35b244f79100 (2018-11-30)
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=6453222232be364fb8ce3fd29b6cbcd480e5f2e3&tochange=950f6d29da967b9999ce709e94bf35b244f79100

Regression range when about:Crashparent was redirected to a not found page as good build and crashes Firefox as bad build:
Last good revision: e1fafe357b36270b835acf86f17aef855ce76fa5 (2018-05-18)
First bad revision: f980d3e2fef7b4f94ea7e709982b0bbf35721150 (2018-05-19)
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=e1fafe357b36270b835acf86f17aef855ce76fa5&tochange=f980d3e2fef7b4f94ea7e709982b0bbf35721150
Possible regressor: Bug 1462702.
Revision 1 by
on 
I found two regression ranges here and I don’t know what's the expected behavior:

* Regression range when good build crashes the browser and bad build redirects the user to a blank page:
Last good revision: 6453222232be364fb8ce3fd29b6cbcd480e5f2e3 (2018-11-29)
First bad revision: 950f6d29da967b9999ce709e94bf35b244f79100 (2018-11-30)
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=6453222232be364fb8ce3fd29b6cbcd480e5f2e3&tochange=950f6d29da967b9999ce709e94bf35b244f79100

* Regression range when about:Crashparent was redirected to a not found page as good build and crashes Firefox as bad build:
Last good revision: e1fafe357b36270b835acf86f17aef855ce76fa5 (2018-05-18)
First bad revision: f980d3e2fef7b4f94ea7e709982b0bbf35721150 (2018-05-19)
Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=e1fafe357b36270b835acf86f17aef855ce76fa5&tochange=f980d3e2fef7b4f94ea7e709982b0bbf35721150
Possible regressor: Bug 1462702.

Back to Bug 1623291 Comment 1