Over in bug 1340235, I noticed that the table has known length - initial and max are the same. We should find out if this is common, because if it is then the table bound can be baked into the table bounds check, it need not be loaded from tls.
Bug 1625891 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Over in bug 1340235, I noticed that the table has known length - initial and max are the same. We should find out if this is common, because if it is then the table bound can be baked into the table bounds check, it need not be loaded from tls. (Edit: I'm doing this particular change as part of bug 1743586.)
Over in bug 1340235, I noticed that the table has known length - initial and max are the same. We should find out if this is common, because if it is then the table bound can be baked into the table bounds check, it need not be loaded from tls. (Edit: I'm doing this particular change as part of bug 1743586.) Edit: According to bug 1743586 comment 5, known table length (min==max) is the common case, and code has landed to bake a known limit into the bounds check.