Pascal, the signature is new in 89 because I added the explicit crash into 89. These used to show up as other crashes, such as bug 1645841. There is really nothing more I can do aside from bug 1704792 which changes how we rasterize SVG images. It may help a bit. At some point, we have to live with OOMs because the user has too little memory, and too much using what they have.
Bug 1702132 Comment 14 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Pascal, the signature is new in 89 because I added the explicit crash into 89. These used to show up as other crashes, such as bug 1645841. Likely it also showed up in other crash signatures I haven't identified. There is really nothing more I can do aside from bug 1704792 which changes how we rasterize SVG images. It may help a bit. At some point, we have to live with OOMs because the user has too little memory, and too much using what they have.
Pascal, the signature is new in 89 because I added the explicit crash into 89. These used to show up as other crashes, such as bug 1645841. Likely it also showed up in other crash signatures I haven't identified. There is really nothing more I can do aside from bug 1704792 which changes how we rasterize SVG images. It may help a bit. At some point, we have to live with OOMs because the user has too little memory, and too much using what they have. That is what the existing crash reports show. If they have < 1 GB of virtual memory available after we unmapped every single buffer we can with WR, and they want to map in 200+ MB or more, there is little to be done.