The spec says that for a reversed counter:
> Instantiates a reversed counter of the given <counter-name> with a starting value of the given <integer>, or no starting value if not given.
But when I test this, I find that for both `list-item` and an author created counter the default starting value is the number of elements in the current nesting level - ie. making it easy to count backwards from the number of elements to one. Is that correct?
Bug 1706346 Comment 21 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
The spec says that for a reversed counter:
> Instantiates a reversed counter of the given <counter-name> with a starting value of the given <integer>, or no starting value if not given.
But when I test this, I find that for both `list-item` and an _author created_ counter the default starting value is the number of elements in the current nesting level - ie. making it easy to count backwards from the number of elements to one. Is that correct?
I ask because I thought my first test showed `list-item` working this way but not author created. New test seems to show both do.