(In reply to Daniel Veditz [:dveditz] from comment #47) > It will work better as a "decoy" if it's not a hidden bug. Anyone object to that? It was wsmwk (not on cc) who had suggested for the decoy bug to be hidden. But it was only a suggestion. If we have good reason to unhide it, it should be fine with him.
Bug 1737470 Comment 48 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
deleted
(In reply to Daniel Veditz [:dveditz] from comment #47) > It will work better as a "decoy" if it's not a hidden bug. Anyone object to that? It was wsmwk (not on cc) who had suggested for the decoy bug to be hidden. But it was only a suggestion. If we have good reason to unhide it, it should be fine with him.