Bug 1740958 Comment 1 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
I can't seem to reproduce this in v91. But the calendar code similarly doesn't take `weeks` into account in 91.

@darktrojan, can you confirm if 91 isn't effected? Do you know if something change in the backend such that the returned object from `subtractDate` is different than in 91, such that `weeks` wouldn't be set?
Revision 1 by
on 
I can't seem to reproduce this in v91. But the calendar code similarly doesn't take `weeks` into account in 91. And looking in the debugger, it seems that `subtractDate` returns an object with `days = 7`.

@darktrojan, can you confirm if 91 isn't effected? Do you know if something change in the backend such that the returned object from `subtractDate` is different than in 91, such that `weeks` wouldn't be set?

Back to Bug 1740958 Comment 1