Bug 1743509 Comment 5 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

> The protocol label ends up on its own row only if the hostname is long enough to force a text wrap.

Ah, that's nice, I didn't realize that. Maybe add a screenshot for that normal case?

> Does the reading flow of the data make sense with protocol type and protocol title?

If we do it like this, then indeed, It should be "Incoming IMAP <hostname>". And, to make the domain stick out more, I would *not* make the "Incoming" and "Username" labels bold.
> The protocol label ends up on its own row only if the hostname is long enough to force a text wrap.

Ah, that's nice, I didn't realize that. Maybe add a screenshot for that normal case?

> Does the reading flow of the data make sense with protocol type and protocol title?

If we do it like this, then indeed, It should be "Incoming IMAP <hostname>".
And, to make the domain stick out more, I would *not* make the "Incoming" and "Username" labels bold.

Back to Bug 1743509 Comment 5