Bug 1771025 Comment 4 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
This is my more-minimal testcase. I'm off for the rest of this week, feel free to take this if this is urgent to anyone.
Revision 1 by
on 
This is my more-minimal testcase. I'm off for the rest of this week, feel free to take this if this is urgent to anyone.

The clon() and match() after that are interesting, I think those are supposed to be effectively no-op.
Revision 2 by
on 
This is my more-minimal testcase. I'm off for the rest of this week, feel free to take this if this is urgent to anyone.

The clone() and match() after that are interesting, I think those are supposed to be effectively no-op.
Revision 3 by
on 
This is my more-minimal testcase. I'm off for the rest of this week, feel free to take this if this is urgent to anyone.

The clone() and match() after that are interesting. I think those are supposed to be effectively no-op, but both are needed for this.
Revision 4 by
on 
This is my more-minimal testcase. I'm off for the rest of this week, feel free to take this if this is urgent to anyone.

The clone() and match() after that are interesting. I think those are supposed to be effectively no-op, but both are needed for this.

`resp1.body` getter must happen before `.clone()` for some unknown reason.

Back to Bug 1771025 Comment 4