(In reply to Daniel Adams from comment #13) > (In reply to Sergio Villar from comment #12) > > May I ask why it was marked as Wontfix? I can provide any additional information that is required to fix it. > > Many existing bug reports (and even recent ones such as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1785869) in the WebVR module have been closed as WONTFIX, I would imagine because there is no one to help work on or maintain the module internally anymore and there haven't been plans for WebXR since unshipping WebVR https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/S9ltYIfjCpg?pli=1. This is correct. We may develop WebXR at some point but currently it is not on a roadmap. If and when we do we'll likely resurrect some of these wontfix bugs.
Bug 1771854 Comment 14 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Daniel Adams from comment #13) > (In reply to Sergio Villar from comment #12) > > May I ask why it was marked as Wontfix? I can provide any additional information that is required to fix it. > > Many existing bug reports (and even recent ones such as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1785869) in the WebVR module have been closed as WONTFIX, I would imagine because there is no one to help work on or maintain the module internally anymore and there haven't been plans for WebXR since unshipping WebVR https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/S9ltYIfjCpg?pli=1. This is correct. We may develop WebXR at some point but currently it is not on a roadmap. If and when we do we'll likely resurrect some of these wontfix bugs. Also, contributors are welcome to work on this area of the code if they like, I'm sure we can find the bandwidth to do reviews.