The tentative plan is fine. But I don’t want to see the mixture of link and Bug IDs, hence the proposal. * See Also: internal bug IDs only * URL field: any external links Will file a separate bug for that, which won’t block the Bugzilla 6 release. The following fields would all be bug ID fields: * Depends on * Blocks * Regressions (to be added soon) * Regressed by (to be added soon) * See Also * Duplicates (currently read-only)
Bug 577847 Comment 21 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
The tentative plan is fine. But I don’t want to see the mixture of links and Bug IDs, hence the proposal. * See Also: internal bug IDs only * URL field: any external links Will file a separate bug for that, which won’t block the Bugzilla 6 release. The following fields would all be bug ID fields: * Depends on * Blocks * Regressions (to be added soon) * Regressed by (to be added soon) * See Also * Duplicates (currently read-only)
The tentative plan is fine. But I don’t want to see the mixture of links and Bug IDs in the same field, hence the proposal. * See Also: internal bug IDs only * URL field: any external links Will file a separate bug for that, which won’t block the Bugzilla 6 release. The following fields would all be bug ID fields: * Depends on * Blocks * Regressions (to be added soon) * Regressed by (to be added soon) * See Also * Duplicates (currently read-only)
The tentative plan is fine. But I don’t want to see the mixture of links and Bug IDs in the same field, hence the proposal. * See Also: internal bug IDs only * URL field: any external links Will file a separate bug for that, which won’t block the Bugzilla 6 release. The following fields would all be bug IDs fields: * Depends on * Blocks * Regressions (to be added soon) * Regressed by (to be added soon) * See Also * Duplicates (currently read-only)