Back to bug 298906

Who When What Removed Added
chpe 2005-06-27 06:43:07 PDT CC mathias.hasselmann
timeless 2005-06-27 07:44:27 PDT CC rrelyea
wtc 2005-06-27 10:13:29 PDT Attachment #187407 Flags review?(rrelyea), superreview?(nelson)
wtc 2005-06-27 10:18:32 PDT CC nelson
nelson 2005-06-27 11:25:36 PDT Attachment #187407 Flags superreview?(nelson) superreview-
wtc 2005-06-28 17:31:28 PDT Attachment #187407 Attachment description Proposed patch Proposed patch (for NSS_3_10_BRANCH)
nelson 2005-06-29 20:00:11 PDT Attachment #187738 Flags review-
rrelyea 2005-07-06 13:21:24 PDT Attachment #187407 Flags review?(rrelyea)
rrelyea 2005-07-28 16:33:22 PDT Attachment #190903 Flags review?(wtchang), superreview?(nelson)
rrelyea 2005-07-28 16:33:37 PDT Attachment #190904 Flags review?(wtchang), superreview?(nelson)
nelson 2005-07-29 13:49:58 PDT Attachment #190904 Attachment description I prefer the previous patch but I need to clean out my tree. (duplicate of previous patch)
Attachment #190904 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
Attachment #190904 Flags review?(wtchang), superreview?(nelson)
nelson 2005-07-29 14:03:06 PDT Attachment #190903 Attachment description I prefer the previous patch but I need to clean out my tree. Patch unrelated to bug 298906
Attachment #190903 Flags review?(wtchang), superreview?(nelson) superreview-
rrelyea 2005-07-29 14:28:41 PDT Attachment #190903 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
Attachment #190982 Flags review?(wtchang), superreview?(nelson)
nelson 2005-07-30 13:07:30 PDT Attachment #190982 Flags superreview?(nelson) superreview+
wtc 2005-08-01 10:47:46 PDT Attachment #187738 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
wtc 2005-08-01 11:07:50 PDT Attachment #190982 Flags review?(wtchang) review+
rrelyea 2005-08-01 11:24:29 PDT Status NEW RESOLVED
Resolution --- FIXED
Target Milestone --- 3.11
Closed 2005-08-01 18:24:29
wtc 2005-12-15 16:47:34 PST CC mhovis
mehovis 2005-12-16 07:57:51 PST Attachment #206088 Flags review?
wtc 2005-12-16 10:09:39 PST Attachment #206088 Attachment is obsolete 0 1
Attachment #206088 Flags review? review-

Back to bug 298906