Closed
Bug 1024766
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
OSCON CTA Cards
Categories
(Marketing :: Design, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Due Date:
People
(Reporter: rchau, Assigned: mternoway)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.01 MB,
application/vnd.pdf
|
Details |
>>Project/Request Title: OSCON CTA Cards >>Project Overview: This is to be a series of business card- or trading card-sized cards that serve as short, quick reference cards about the main products and services that Mozilla offers, with short snippets of information and a URL to direct readers to for more information. These cards will be launched at OSCON 2014, but reused for many other events too. It would be a quick, fun way to get people to learn a bit more about what Mozilla offers (collect them all!), and more unique and intriguing than a traditional one-sheet, brochure, pamphlet, etc. >> Creative Help Needed: Copy: Yes Design: Yes Video: No Other: No >>Creative Specs: Trading card (like a baseball card), or business card shape - open to suggestion here Deliverable: (6) unique designs as print-ready PDF files with 0.125" bleeds Design #1: Front Side: - MDN branding (logo, color) - "developer.mozilla.org" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox OS Simulator is and how you (the developer) can use it - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Firefox_OS_Simulator" Design #2: Front Side: - MDN branding (logo, color) - "developer.mozilla.org" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox Browser Console is and how you (the developer) can use it - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Browser_Console" Design #3: Front Side: - MDN branding (logo, color) - "developer.mozilla.org" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox for Android remote debugging tools are and how you (the developer) can use them - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Remote_Debugging/Firefox_for_Android" Design #4: Front Side: - MDN branding (logo, color) - "developer.mozilla.org" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Mozilla Developer Network is and how you can join. - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Connect" Design #5: Front Side: - Mozilla branding (logo, color) - "https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about Mozilla's privacy principles, something like "Did you know Mozilla cares about YOUR privacy?" (this is aimed at users and developers) - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to our Privacy Principles page "https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/principles/" Design #6: Front Side: - Firefox (logo, color) - "firefox.com" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about the new Australis, something like "Did you know Mozilla designed Australis with YOU in mind?" (this is aimed at users and developers) - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/desktop/" >>CTA and Design: CTA is to get people thinking about Mozilla's tools and products, using our developer tools, and downloading Australis. >>Creative Due Date: 2014-07-01 >>Launch Date: 2014-07-20 >>Mozilla Goal: Adoption of developer tools (Firefox OS, Firefox, and Firefox for Android) >>Points of Contact: sprasad@mozilla.com, bkerensa@gmail.com
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: jbalaco → mternoway
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Hi all, I am currently in the works on a layout for the CTA cards and am wondering if someone can provide me with the shortened mz.la URLs for each of the backsides ? Thanks, Matt
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to MT from comment #1) > Hi all, I am currently in the works on a layout for the CTA cards and am > wondering if someone can provide me with the shortened mz.la URLs for each > of the backsides ? > > Thanks, > Matt Are the mzl.la links right to use here? In my experience we don't tend to use them for things like this. For desktop, at least, we should use firefox.com/desktop and for privacy we could simply use mozilla.org/privacy (though maybe mozilla.org/privacy/you is a better destination URL?). Whatever we use, let's make sure not to include "www" or the language code (en-us). Thanks.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
I agree with that approach for the general cards, Matej, but I'm not sure what we do with the specific dev tools' URLs (remote debugging, simulator, and console). Also the CTA for the MDN design is particularly directed to the "Connect" page of the MDN site, do you think directing to developer.mozilla.org will sufficiently convey the CTA here?
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #3) > I agree with that approach for the general cards, Matej, but I'm not sure > what we do with the specific dev tools' URLs (remote debugging, simulator, > and console). Also the CTA for the MDN design is particularly directed to > the "Connect" page of the MDN site, do you think directing to > developer.mozilla.org will sufficiently convey the CTA here? Yup, that's a good point. And sorry, I didn't give comment 0 a close enough read. It makes sense to use the shortened URLs for the various developer pages, but otherwise we should have short enough URLs for the others. What do you think about the privacy page? Which one do you want to use? I also see stuff like this in comment 0: "Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox Browser Console is and how you (the developer) can use it" Where can we get that info? What would you like to say about each? Could someone provide draft copy for those? Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Gotcha - here are the developer tools shortlinks: Design #1: http://mzl.la/1nAEo7a Design #2: http://mzl.la/1nAEpYP Design #3: http://mzl.la/UHcX3v I love the mozilla.org/privacy/you URL for the Privacy card, Design #5, feels very personal. For the blurbs, I'm thinking the following folks might be able to help: Dave Camp and Jeff Griffiths for the Console blurb, Christian Heilmann for the Simulator, and Michelle Luna for Firefox for Android. Dave, Jeff, Christian, and Michelle, can you come up with a short 1-2 sentence blurb about the various items in the original bug description, based on your respective specialties, please? This is my first pass at folks who could contribute, please let me know if there's someone else who might be more appropriate.
Flags: needinfo?(mluna)
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Flags: needinfo?(dcamp)
Flags: needinfo?(cheilmann)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Note, Michelle - the blurb request is specifically for the remote debugger, not Fx for Android in general.
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #5) ... > Dave, Jeff, Christian, and Michelle, can you come up with a short 1-2 > sentence blurb about the various items in the original bug description, > based on your respective specialties, please? For this one: Design #2: Front Side: - MDN branding (logo, color) - "developer.mozilla.org" URL Back Side: - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox Browser Console is and how you (the developer) can use it - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Browser_Console" ...I don't understand how we got to focusing on the browser console for this. Who is the target audience for this, web developers? Add-on developers? Firefox team members? Aside: as of Monday, the App Manager is now 'WebIDE'.
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths) → needinfo?(rchau)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jeff Griffiths (:canuckistani) from comment #7) > (In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #5) > ... > > Dave, Jeff, Christian, and Michelle, can you come up with a short 1-2 > > sentence blurb about the various items in the original bug description, > > based on your respective specialties, please? > > For this one: > > Design #2: > Front Side: > - MDN branding (logo, color) > - "developer.mozilla.org" URL > Back Side: > - Short, 1-2 sentence blurb about what the Firefox Browser Console is and > how you (the developer) can use it > - "See more at" or "Learn more at" the mz.la short link that points to > "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Browser_Console" > > ...I don't understand how we got to focusing on the browser console for > this. Who is the target audience for this, web developers? Add-on > developers? Firefox team members? > > Aside: as of Monday, the App Manager is now 'WebIDE'. Hello Jeff, The target audience is Web Developers for Design #2 although we do feel there could be some value to highlighting this tool to power users.
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #8) > The target audience is Web Developers for Design #2 although we do feel > there could be some value to highlighting this tool to power users. Do you instead mean the 'web console'? The Browser console delivers all logging messages from Firefox and might be most useful to add-on or Firefox develoeprs. The Web Console is in the devtools toolbox and only shows logs from the current web page, so IMO it is generally more useful to web developers.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
I'll defer to Benjamin for this one.
Flags: needinfo?(rchau) → needinfo?(bkerensa)
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jeff Griffiths (:canuckistani) from comment #9) > (In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #8) > > The target audience is Web Developers for Design #2 although we do feel > > there could be some value to highlighting this tool to power users. > > Do you instead mean the 'web console'? The Browser console delivers all > logging messages from Firefox and might be most useful to add-on or Firefox > develoeprs. The Web Console is in the devtools toolbox and only shows logs > from the current web page, so IMO it is generally more useful to web > developers. Yes "Web Console"
Flags: needinfo?(bkerensa)
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
FYI Christian is at Google I/O this week and may be delayed in getting back to this thread. Matej, is there a method by which you source SMEs when you craft official Mozilla copy? My instinct is to track down product leads, but it's tricky to get people's time these days.
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #12) > FYI Christian is at Google I/O this week and may be delayed in getting back > to this thread. Matej, is there a method by which you source SMEs when you > craft official Mozilla copy? My instinct is to track down product leads, but > it's tricky to get people's time these days. That entirely depends on what "SME" means. I've never heard that before.
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Oh sorry. "Subject matter expert."
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #14) > Oh sorry. "Subject matter expert." Ah, thank you. I'll be honest, I'm not usually the one tracking people down, so I'm sure what the process is. I just want to make sure we're saying the right thing for the right audience.
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Update: Dave will be providing the copy for Designs 2 and 3.
Flags: needinfo?(mluna)
Flags: needinfo?(dcamp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Hi guys, I know we are still finalizing copy for this, but I realized I haven't shown any design yet. Here is a link to the direction I am thinking for these. http://cl.ly/image/2z2F0C1g163D . Top row shows the front side of the various cards and bottom row is the back side. All copy is place holder at the moment, but thought this could give a better indicator to the amount of space to work with. You will see for the Firefox backside, I've included an option which focuses on the use of icons and power bars (like old Marvel trading cards). This might be a bit much and would take some extra massaging of content to work, but thought I'd throw it in there as an option. Otherwise I think something simple like a logo, few lines and a CTA would do the trick nicely. For the MDN card, I realize there are 3 options for this...I haven't altered the design to make each distinct at this point, but perhaps the various copy for each would define the card enough? Let me know what you think. Thanks! Matt
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Matt, I love these!! I think they're really great and very eye-catching. I'm not sure about the power bars, while I love the look I'm not sure they'll convey clear messaging - John, what are your thoughts? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(jslater)
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
Copy received from Dave re:Android remote debugger: "You can debug a page running in Firefox for Android using the complete suite of Firefox Developer Tools on your desktop." Should we add a "Did you know?" ahead of this?
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
I love the look. Hard to say for sure on the power bars, as I'm not totally clear on the content needs here. I will say that I think they *could* work, but also that they're probably not essential. It may come down to how much time we have to play around with that content. Should we be using the blueprint background for the developer one?
Flags: needinfo?(jslater)
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
I also like the overall look of each CTA Card but the bars are a bit confusing to me. The blueprint background on the MDN/Dev CTA might look nice too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the feedback. I've added in the subtle grid background for the MDN card. I think it ties it in closer to the MDN brand. Since there will be 3 different MDN cards, we ok with having just the copy define each of those, or is there a need to visually define them as well? http://cl.ly/image/00211w3z0y08 With regards to the bars, I think I was creating an unnecessary problem...got caught up in trading card nostalgia :S
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to MT from comment #22) > Thanks for the feedback. I've added in the subtle grid background for the > MDN card. I think it ties it in closer to the MDN brand. Since there will be > 3 different MDN cards, we ok with having just the copy define each of those, > or is there a need to visually define them as well? > > http://cl.ly/image/00211w3z0y08 > > With regards to the bars, I think I was creating an unnecessary > problem...got caught up in trading card nostalgia :S The last link has a placeholder PNG Icon but not the updated mockup.
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
Oops, thanks for catching. http://cl.ly/image/3X2x2d451C3i
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
+1 on this latest revision it really looks crisp
Reporter | ||
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Met with Stormy, Shez, and Benjamin today - consensus was that we should go with one MDN design, instead of four, and just provide very short links and blurbs about the main tools listed in Designs 1-3 (Remote Debugger, Web Console, Simulator). So that should leave us with 1 Firefox card, 1 MDN card, and 1 privacy card.
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
One last bit is Stormy had feedback that she would like to see somewhere on the card "OSCON 2014" she thinks this will add the benefit of making it feel collectable.
Comment 28•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #27) > One last bit is Stormy had feedback that she would like to see somewhere on > the card "OSCON 2014" she thinks this will add the benefit of making it feel > collectable. I think that's easy enough to incorporate, but based on the following instruction in comment 0 we thought these are supposed to live on beyond this one event: "These cards will be launched at OSCON 2014, but reused for many other events too." Can you confirm? Thanks.
Comment 29•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Matej Novak [:matej] from comment #28) > (In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #27) > > One last bit is Stormy had feedback that she would like to see somewhere on > > the card "OSCON 2014" she thinks this will add the benefit of making it feel > > collectable. > > I think that's easy enough to incorporate, but based on the following > instruction in comment 0 we thought these are supposed to live on beyond > this one event: > > "These cards will be launched at OSCON 2014, but reused for many other > events too." > > Can you confirm? Thanks. Hi Matej, So I definately think based on discussions we have had with the rest of Dev Rel that they do want to re-use these CTA's for other events so I guess our hope is if we can have a generic template which Dev Rel would use more generally and have one with OSCON 2014 on the card wherever it may be appropriate.
Reporter | ||
Comment 30•10 years ago
|
||
+1 to Comment 29. The idea Stormy was thinking of is that the CTA cards could be kind of collector's items, and that this round would have OSCON 2014 on them, and we simply swap out that event name for the next event name (say, BrazilJS 2014).
Reporter | ||
Comment 31•10 years ago
|
||
Simulator copy: The simulator creates an emulated phone right on your desktop machine and allows you to build and test apps without having to have one. Not sure if this would be too long to include on the MDN card with the remote debugger and web console blurbs?
Flags: needinfo?(cheilmann) → needinfo?(Mnovak)
Comment 32•10 years ago
|
||
For Privacy perhaps... "Did you know Mozilla was recognized as the most trusted Internet Company for Privacy" https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/01/28/privacy-day-2013/ Lets see if we can get feedback from Sid Stamm but I think this is a good highlight.
Comment 33•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #32) > For Privacy perhaps... > > "Did you know Mozilla was recognized as the most trusted Internet Company > for Privacy" I'd be cautious about this (especially given all the churn in this space, people may not agree with this claim), but adding the year to the statement may make a nice nugget of info. Some ideas: Do we want something about Do Not Track?[0] We could make a card with something about how Mozilla helped pioneer the Do Not Track feature to give web users a voice in how their data is collected and used... We could also make a card about Lightbeam (the addon formerly known as collusion). Or feature-wise, we could make a card about private browsing mode in Firefox.[1] :) For security, we could identify our security bug bounty program (we pay security researchers for their security bugs) or make a card for Content Security Policy (a feature that lets web devs secure their site[2]). [0] http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/dnt/ [1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-browse-web-without-saving-info [2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/CSP/Introducing_Content_Security_Policy
Comment 34•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sid Stamm [:geekboy or :sstamm] from comment #33) > (In reply to Benjamin Kerensa [:bkerensa] from comment #32) > > For Privacy perhaps... > > > > "Did you know Mozilla was recognized as the most trusted Internet Company > > for Privacy" > > I'd be cautious about this (especially given all the churn in this space, > people may not agree with this claim), but adding the year to the statement > may make a nice nugget of info. > > Some ideas: > > Do we want something about Do Not Track?[0] We could make a card with > something about how Mozilla helped pioneer the Do Not Track feature to give > web users a voice in how their data is collected and used... We could also > make a card about Lightbeam (the addon formerly known as collusion). > > Or feature-wise, we could make a card about private browsing mode in > Firefox.[1] :) > > For security, we could identify our security bug bounty program (we pay > security researchers for their security bugs) or make a card for Content > Security Policy (a feature that lets web devs secure their site[2]). > > [0] http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/dnt/ > [1] > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-browse-web-without- > saving-info > [2] > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/CSP/ > Introducing_Content_Security_Policy Thanks for that feedback Sid. Something on DNT would work if you want to give a small blurb there we are really trying to highlight how much Mozilla values user privacy.
Flags: needinfo?(sstamm)
Comment 35•10 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the delay, I was at a conference last week and a bit busy. How about: "Do Not Track (a feature in Firefox) allows you to tell websites you don't like third-party tracking, including behavioral advertising. Learn more at [url]" [url] https://www.mozilla.org/dnt/
Flags: needinfo?(sstamm)
Reporter | ||
Comment 36•10 years ago
|
||
Hi team, The printer will need the design ASAP - can we send over the Firefox and the Privacy cards by EOD today? For the MDN card, here are the options I'm seeing: 1) We have one liners and short URLs for the remote debugger, the web console, and for the simulator on the back of the card. Concern: still need copy, also would be cramped to include this text in the card space. 2) We have the MDN card feature a URL that points to a wiki page that highlights these three tools and has the space for the blurbs as well. 3) We have the MDN card feature the overall tools page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools. Stormy, Benjamin, what do you think? Also, this can just be for OSCON, we can adjust the design for future iterations of this card, we just need to get a design out the door today. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(stormy)
Flags: needinfo?(bkerensa)
Comment 38•10 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the delayed response here. Robyn, any chance you could put all the copy you need me to review into a single comment to make sure I'm looking at the latest and correct versions? Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(rchau)
Reporter | ||
Comment 39•10 years ago
|
||
Sure thing Matej, had to take a minute and grab it all myself. Here's my suggestion, based on this thread and separate email threads: Ref Matt's latest mockup: http://cl.ly/image/3X2x2d451C3i Front of cards: - Tabzilla - relevant logo - "OSCON 2014" copy at bottom Back of cards: - relevant wordmark - blurb - URL Firefox blurb: How you use the Web is unique. Firefox lets you change it to match. Remove what you don’t use, keep what you do and put it just about anywhere you want. Learn more at https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/desktop/ MDN blurb: Create, explore, debug, and more using Mozilla's developer tools for desktop and mobile. Learn more at https://developer.mozilla.org/tools Privacy blurb: Do Not Track (a feature in Firefox) allows you to tell websites you don't like third-party tracking, including behavioral advertising. Learn more at https://www.mozilla.org/dnt How do these sound?
Flags: needinfo?(rchau)
Flags: needinfo?(bkerensa)
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Comment 41•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks, Robyn. That helps a lot. Here are my edits: Firefox blurb: How you use the Web is unique. Firefox lets you change it to match. Remove what you don’t use, keep what you do and put it just about anywhere you want. Learn more at firefox.com/desktop MDN blurb: Create, explore, debug and more using Mozilla developer tools for desktop and mobile. Learn more at developer.mozilla.org/tools Privacy blurb (v1): Do Not Track is a feature in Firefox that helps put you in control of the way your information is collected and used online. Learn more at mozilla.org/dnt Privacy blurb (v2): Do Not Track, a Firefox feature, lets you tell websites that you want to opt out of tracking for purposes like behavioral advertising. Learn more at mozilla.org/dnt (Two versions of the privacy blurb above. I prefer v1.)
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Reporter | ||
Comment 42•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Matej Novak [:matej] from comment #41) > Thanks, Robyn. That helps a lot. Here are my edits: > > Firefox blurb: > How you use the Web is unique. Firefox lets you change it to match. Remove > what you don’t use, keep what you do and put it just about anywhere you > want. > Learn more at firefox.com/desktop +1 > MDN blurb: > Create, explore, debug and more using Mozilla developer tools for desktop > and mobile. > Learn more at developer.mozilla.org/tools +1 > Privacy blurb (v1): > Do Not Track is a feature in Firefox that helps put you in control of the > way your information is collected and used online. > Learn more at mozilla.org/dnt > > Privacy blurb (v2): > Do Not Track, a Firefox feature, lets you tell websites that you want to opt > out of tracking for purposes like behavioral advertising. > Learn more at mozilla.org/dnt > > (Two versions of the privacy blurb above. I prefer v1.) I prefer v1 too. Benjamin?
Flags: needinfo?(bkerensa)
Comment 44•10 years ago
|
||
Hi All, Just doing some bug clean-up and wanted to find out what else is needed from the Creative Team on this one. If you're all set, please go ahead and resolve. Thanks! Jennifer
Comment 45•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jennifer Balaco from comment #44) > Hi All, > > Just doing some bug clean-up and wanted to find out what else is needed from > the Creative Team on this one. If you're all set, please go ahead and > resolve. > > Thanks! > Jennifer Hi Jennifer, I think we are still waiting for the final deliverable so we can print by end of day.
Reporter | ||
Comment 46•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Matt - are we good to go with print-ready versions to send to the printer today? He'll need them by 1p PT for an on-time delivery. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•10 years ago
|
||
Hey Robyn, here is the print ready PDF. I've included latest copy as well as URLs. If everyone is ok with this...it's good to go.
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Comment 48•10 years ago
|
||
Should the URLs on the front be the more general ones that go with the logo shown and then save the more detailed URLs for the back? Firefox — firefox.com MDN — developer.mozilla.org Mozilla — mozilla.org Either way, let's change the CTA line to one of the following: Learn more at [URL GOES HERE] OR Learn more: [URL GOES HERE] (i.e. it should have "at" or a colon, but not both)
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks Matej. That makes sense to me for the front...since it's the general logo. As for the back, I like 'Learn more at'.
Reporter | ||
Comment 50•10 years ago
|
||
I like "Learn more at" too. Also, I think we were going to have "OSCON 2014" at the bottom of the front of each card, yes?
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Comment 51•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #50) > I like "Learn more at" too. Also, I think we were going to have "OSCON 2014" > at the bottom of the front of each card, yes? That's totally up to you. I wasn't sure where we landed on that, but I do think it's better to have the name of the even rather than URLs on both sides.
Flags: needinfo?(Mnovak)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(stormy)
Comment 52•10 years ago
|
||
We could make these short urls and then we could track how many people actually visited them, e.g. mzl.la/devtools. I added Luke Crouch who can generate them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 53•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #50) > I like "Learn more at" too. Also, I think we were going to have "OSCON 2014" > at the bottom of the front of each card, yes? If we are to include OSCON 2014 or similar, it would make sense to use their branded wordmark. I've seen it a few ways though, and unable to track down an official vector version. Is this something we have access to?
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Comment 54•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to MT from comment #53) > (In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #50) > > I like "Learn more at" too. Also, I think we were going to have "OSCON 2014" > > at the bottom of the front of each card, yes? > > If we are to include OSCON 2014 or similar, it would make sense to use their > branded wordmark. I've seen it a few ways though, and unable to track down > an official vector version. Is this something we have access to? We do not and by the time we got a response from O'Reilly it could push us past the 1PM PST deadline for print
Reporter | ||
Comment 55•10 years ago
|
||
Just had a call with the OSCON organizers - we do NOT have the rights to use the official OSCON wordmark. Also, Stormy - not sure if there is a way to generate the appropriate tracking URL for each of these by the time these need to get to the printer. Luke and I had a brief IRC chat today and there were some snags, NI'ing him to be sure.
Flags: needinfo?(lcrouch)
Reporter | ||
Comment 56•10 years ago
|
||
So we are pointing not to Do Not Track, but mozilla.org, and not to the Tools page, but to the MDN page, correct?
Comment 57•10 years ago
|
||
Short url's for tracking could/would be: Firefox: mzl.la/oscon14-firefox to https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/new/ MDN: mzl.la/oscon14-mdn to https://developer.mozilla.org Mozilla: mzl.la/oscon14-mozilla to https://www.mozilla.org/ Robyn/Benjamin - approve?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(rchau)
Flags: needinfo?(lcrouch)
Flags: needinfo?(bkerensa)
Reporter | ||
Comment 58•10 years ago
|
||
Looks good to me! Requesting Stormy's approval as well.
Flags: needinfo?(rchau) → needinfo?(stormy)
Comment 59•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Luke Crouch [:groovecoder] from comment #57) > Short url's for tracking could/would be: > > Firefox: mzl.la/oscon14-firefox to https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/new/ > MDN: mzl.la/oscon14-mdn to https://developer.mozilla.org > Mozilla: mzl.la/oscon14-mozilla to https://www.mozilla.org/ > > Robyn/Benjamin - approve? I actually think on the back we should point to the specific things we're talking about (/desktop, /tools, /dnt). Otherwise we're making users do a lot more work to find them. Those shortened URLs also aren't very friendly for users to have to type manually (which could skew any potential testing). I would strongly recommend we keep the URLs in comment 41.
Reporter | ||
Comment 60•10 years ago
|
||
+1 that the URLs are cleaner, however at this point we'll have to sacrifice one goal over another: visual or tracking. I'll ask Stormy to make the call on this one, as she's the Accountable on this event. My two cents: I'd go with a mzl.la link to track the /dnt, /tools, and /desktop hits for the event, as understanding the impact we have at OSCON is a priority, and this is a casual and web creator audience who I don't think would mind an extra couple of keystrokes, esp as these tracker URLs make logical sense without being annoying (ie. vs. mzl.la/ase87agh2). If the audience were more marketing or executive-targeted, I'd stick to the straightforward ones, but I'm voting for the tracker URLs.
Comment 61•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robyn Chau from comment #60) > +1 that the URLs are cleaner, however at this point we'll have to sacrifice > one goal over another: visual or tracking. I'll ask Stormy to make the call > on this one, as she's the Accountable on this event. > > My two cents: I'd go with a mzl.la link to track the /dnt, /tools, and > /desktop hits for the event, as understanding the impact we have at OSCON is > a priority, and this is a casual and web creator audience who I don't think > would mind an extra couple of keystrokes, esp as these tracker URLs make > logical sense without being annoying (ie. vs. mzl.la/ase87agh2). If the > audience were more marketing or executive-targeted, I'd stick to the > straightforward ones, but I'm voting for the tracker URLs. In that case, let's make sure they're pointing to the correct URLs: mozilla.org/dnt developer.mozilla.org/tools firefox.com/desktop (which redirects to mozilla.org/firefox/desktop) Thanks.
Comment 62•10 years ago
|
||
It pains me to make a decision that would lose us metrics but I agree that the benefit of tracking is not worth losing the mozilla.org branding. mzl.la is kind of ugly on a card. Now, if we'd gone with the one page for OSCON that had the 3 links off of it, we could have a beautiful url for that, track hits to that page and then have mzl links off of it. Next time!
Flags: needinfo?(stormy)
Comment 63•10 years ago
|
||
Okay, so to be clear: I *WILL NOT* create mzl.la short-links for these. Robyn and I already discussed that we *can* measure Portland-based traffic on mozilla.org and developer.mozilla.org during OSCON to get an overall sense of how effective our presence is. But for future events, I agree - a nice event-specific landing page will do best.
Reporter | ||
Comment 64•10 years ago
|
||
Noted for the future! So, Matt, for this set of cards, we'll go with: mozilla.org/dnt developer.mozilla.org/tools firefox.com/desktop Thanks for the quick turnaround on the discussion, all!
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Assignee | ||
Comment 65•10 years ago
|
||
Excellent. Here is an example of where we are at with the info and layout: http://cl.ly/image/0q3X1u2O2a3u If all is considered final, I can post the print ready PDF.
Flags: needinfo?(mternoway)
Reporter | ||
Comment 66•10 years ago
|
||
I love it. Benjamin?
Reporter | ||
Comment 67•10 years ago
|
||
I think Benjamin is offline - in the interest of time I say we move forward.
Assignee | ||
Comment 68•10 years ago
|
||
Hi guys, attached is the updated print ready PDF for the CTA cards. Let me know if there are any issues. Thanks, MT
Attachment #8456269 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•