Closed
Bug 1030900
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[B2G][Contacts][SMS]Able to open contact view twice through app chaining
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Contacts, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: rkuhlman, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [2.0-daily-testing])
Attachments
(1 file)
246.92 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
User can sideload the messaging app from contact details page. From the message thread, the user can sideload the contact details page. This results in a scenario when the user can back out of contact details into messaging app and back into contact details again Repro Steps: 1) Update a Flame to BuildID: 20140626000202 2) Launch contacts app 3) View the details page of a contact with a valid phone number 4) Tap the 'send message' button 5) Send a message to the number. (Message thread should now be displayed) 6) Tap the contact name at the top of the screen 7) Select 'view contact details' Actual: Contact details page is loaded. User can back out of details into messaging and back out of messaging into details again Expected: Apps cannot be double chained. Performing steps 6-7 has similar function to pressing 'X' button in upper left corner. v2.0 Environmental Variables: Device: Flame v2.0 MOZ BuildID: 20140626000202 Gaia: 6a1373340b40fcfe901336bc9e80676e5f2ba979 Gecko: 82ef9bf64d87 Version: 32.0a2 Firmware Version: v122 Notes: Repro frequency: 100% See attached: logcat
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
adding qawanted to determine if issue occurs on 1.4 or Master
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
QA-Wanted to get a video of this first, then kick it back to me before doing branch checks
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
That behaviour has been introduced on purpose.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Francisco - I just wanted to clarify - you are saying we should close this as invalid / by design correct?
Flags: needinfo?(francisco)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Joshua, yes, sorry for being more clear on my previous explanation, but basically I meant that. Cheers, F.
Flags: needinfo?(francisco)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•