Closed Bug 1037082 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

HTTPS proxying proxy auth (407) problems

Categories

(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)

33 Branch
x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla33
Tracking Status
firefox31 --- unaffected
firefox32 --- fixed
firefox33 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: mcmanus, Assigned: mcmanus)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [spdy][http2release])

Attachments

(4 files)

      No description provided.
Whiteboard: [spdy][http2release]
Attachment #8453948 - Flags: review?(hurley) → review+
Attachment #8453949 - Flags: review?(hurley) → review+
Comment on attachment 8453950 [details] [diff] [review]
part 3/3 407 proxy auth for https over https

Review of attachment 8453950 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Side note: this looks like it will also fix an issue I noticed (but had not yet filed) while debugging bug 1014600 (namely that the squid error I get back when trying to connect to a host that doesn't answer never shows up). So, yay!
Attachment #8453950 - Flags: review?(hurley) → review+
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]:378637
[User impact if declined]: New feature does not do proxy auth correctly
[Describe test coverage new/current, TBPL]: on m-c, hand tested to same level as non https proxying
[Risks and why]: risks are constrained to new feature which is on aurora - feature has broken corner case without patch
[String/UUID change made/needed]: none
Attachment #8456337 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8456337 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Although this only landed on m-c yesterday, I'm not sure that giving this another day is going to buy us anything in terms of additional testing. I don't see any tests in the patch. Are there existing automated tests for this functionality?
Flags: needinfo?(mcmanus)
unfortunately we don't have any automated proxy tests in our CI at all - and this feature is an extension of that capability, so it had to be tested by hand right now. Building something is on my todo list, but its considerably bigger than this fix, or even the feature it fixes.
Flags: needinfo?(mcmanus)
Comment on attachment 8456337 [details] [diff] [review]
gecko 32 version of patch

Aurora+

Patrick - Understandable about automating tests for this feature. Can you please run your manual sanity checks on Aurora once this lands?
Attachment #8456337 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
(In reply to Lawrence Mandel [:lmandel] from comment #11)
> . Can you
> please run your manual sanity checks on Aurora once this lands?

yes - I will. I've also already manually checked the patch on a local build of the aurora tree.
(In reply to Lawrence Mandel [:lmandel] from comment #11)
 Can you
> please run your manual sanity checks on Aurora once this lands?

done
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: