Closed Bug 1040432 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Move sdk/system/xul-app to a jsm so that cuddlefish/toolkit loaders can access it easily.

Categories

(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla34

People

(Reporter: evold, Assigned: evold)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

At the moment, the sdk/loader/cuddlefish module loads sdk/system/xul-app in a hacky way in order to provide access to that module for a `incompatibility` function, which checks if a string like `"firefox > 33"` is compatible with the current application.  In order for bug 1037235 to be fixed we need to either implement a similar hack in toolkit/loader, or we can move sdk/system/xul-app logic into a jsm.  I like the latter version, because I will need this logic for bug 1040238 anyhow.

If we develop a system where we can write jsm in the add-on sdk repo, which ship with Fx, then we should be able to get some performance wins too, since we can write whole modules, or portions that only instantiated once.
Assignee: nobody → evold
At the moment I'm using `resource://gre/modules/sdk/xul-app.js` but I'd like to use `resource://gre/modules/sdk/system/xul-app.js`, I'm not sure how to do this with the moz.build file atm though.
Attachment #8459811 - Flags: review?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment on attachment 8459811 [details] [review]
Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/pull/37

Aside from bikeshedding on naming this looks good. Unfortunately I think the only way of setting a custom location to put the module would be to add a moz.build into addon-sdk/source/modules/system. Not terribly scalable but doable.
Attachment #8459811 - Flags: review?(dtownsend+bugmail) → review+
(In reply to Dave Townsend [:mossop] from comment #2)
> Comment on attachment 8459811 [details] [review]
> Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/pull/37
> 
> Aside from bikeshedding on naming this looks good. Unfortunately I think the
> only way of setting a custom location to put the module would be to add a
> moz.build into addon-sdk/source/modules/system. Not terribly scalable but
> doable.

Hmm I made those changes, but the XulApp.js file doesn't seem to be included in Fx now, any idea what I've missed?
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
nvm I got it working now.
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bbf432c84605
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla34
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk

https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/69edfd7ac61fa88c3fc24bd60857409bbc626833
Bug 1040432 - Move sdk/system/xul-app to a jsm so that cuddlefish/toolkit loaders can access it easily. r=Mossop
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: