Closed
Bug 1068987
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Dialogs are not exclusively visible to screen reader
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Gallery, defect)
Tracking
(b2g-v2.2 fixed, b2g-master fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2.2 S6 (20feb)
People
(Reporter: eeejay, Assigned: eeejay)
References
Details
(Keywords: access, Whiteboard: [b2ga11y p=1])
Attachments
(1 file)
46 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
pdahiya
:
review+
djf
:
feedback+
bajaj
:
approval-gaia-v2.2+
|
Details | Review |
When a dialog is showing, the content underneath is still navigable by the screen reader. Some example dialogs: - Delete photo - Photo info - Loading from sd card overlay
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
I chose this approach because (at least in the gallery view) one of the dialogs is translucent. Otherwise, doing this in CSS would be preferable (and potentially cleaner).
Assignee: nobody → eitan
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review?(pdahiya)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Eitan Isaacson [:eeejay] from comment #1) > Created attachment 8556791 [details] [review] > Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 > > I chose this approach because (at least in the gallery view) one of the > dialogs is translucent.Otherwise, doing this in CSS would be preferable > (and potentially cleaner). Can you pl. update which dialog is the translucent one, I looked at the flows and failed to figure it. It's r- because the patch needs to handle deleteSingleItem flow in frames.js https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/gallery/js/frames.js#L128
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review?(pdahiya) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Punam Dahiya from comment #2) > (In reply to Eitan Isaacson [:eeejay] from comment #1) > > Created attachment 8556791 [details] [review] > > Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 > > > > I chose this approach because (at least in the gallery view) one of the > > dialogs is translucent.Otherwise, doing this in CSS would be preferable > > (and potentially cleaner). > > Can you pl. update which dialog is the translucent one, I looked at the > flows and failed to figure it. https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/gallery/style/gallery_tablet.css#L342 > > It's r- because the patch needs to handle deleteSingleItem flow in frames.js > https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/gallery/js/frames. > js#L128 Oops! fixing that..
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 Fixed patch to also hide fullscreen frame on singe item delete dialog.
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review- → review?(pdahiya)
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
I'd prefer a CSS fix to a JS fix here. Tablet is not really supported anymore and the code is out of date. Let's just make the dialog opaque if that is all that is preventing a cleaner CSS-only fix to this bug.
Flags: needinfo?(eitan)
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 Hi Eitan Cancelling the review in favor of CSS fix for this bug. As confirmed by David, we can update tablet css for an opaque dialog. Thanks
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review?(pdahiya)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Flanagan [:djf] from comment #5) > I'd prefer a CSS fix to a JS fix here. Tablet is not really supported > anymore and the code is out of date. Let's just make the dialog opaque if > that is all that is preventing a cleaner CSS-only fix to this bug. Sounds good. This will require putting the dialogs above the main content in markup order, so we could use +/~ selectors.
Flags: needinfo?(eitan)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Eitan Isaacson [:eeejay] from comment #7) > (In reply to David Flanagan [:djf] from comment #5) > > I'd prefer a CSS fix to a JS fix here. Tablet is not really supported > > anymore and the code is out of date. Let's just make the dialog opaque if > > that is all that is preventing a cleaner CSS-only fix to this bug. > > Sounds good. This will require putting the dialogs above the main content in > markup order, so we could use +/~ selectors. Or alternatively, having a class like 'dialog-open' in a parent container.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 Added a body class 'showing-dialog' and have it toggled when a dialog is displayed. The main sections are styled with visibility: hidden to avoid a reflow. This looks lower risk than messing more with markup order.
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: feedback?(dflanagan)
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 This looks good to me. As usual, my main comments are requests for more comments in the code. I don't actually understand why this is necessary. Do all apps have to hide their content when they display a dialog, or is there something weird about Gallery that makes this necessary? Also, did you mean to include the python test changes in this PR, or are they there by mistake?
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: feedback?(dflanagan) → feedback+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Flanagan [:djf] from comment #10) > Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] > Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 > > This looks good to me. As usual, my main comments are requests for more > comments in the code. > Added comments in code, thanks! > I don't actually understand why this is necessary. Do all apps have to hide > their content when they display a dialog, or is there something weird about > Gallery that makes this necessary? > Copying my response from gh: The screen reader does not distinguished between obscured and un-obscured content. First, because it is really hard to do, you need to take into account the relative opacity of each obscuring layout frame, and false positives would be very bad. Also, historically developers would hide text intended for screen readers in different fashions, like putting it in a negative offset, using font-size:0 or obscuring it. The issue of modal dialogs is not unique to this module, and is the most painful part of making gaia accessible. We will need to do this until the <dialog> element is implemented in gecko. > Also, did you mean to include the python test changes in this PR, or are > they there by mistake? Yes, the tests break without those changes.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review?(pdahiya)
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 Thanks Eitan, it's r+ , with gaia-try green it should be good to land.
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: review?(pdahiya) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/68c1588bf5a90b0fff8c9667ef2c8c68ab59569a
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8556791 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/27800 [Approval Request Comment] [Bug caused by] (feature/regressing bug #): [User impact] if declined: Screen reader users will be able to see passed the dialogs into the hidden main content. [Testing completed]: Python UI tests have been altered to test for this as well. [Risk to taking this patch] (and alternatives if risky): Little. [String changes made]: No.
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.2?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8556791 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.2? → approval-gaia-v2.2+
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
v2.2: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/68e0d84c38e2dfdd90119e6d619b54da07a6c97f
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•