Closed
Bug 110069
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
favicon pref needs gui hookup
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)
SeaMonkey
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: MozillaUser, Assigned: MozillaUser)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
2.36 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Well, now that the controversial new browser.chrome.favicons pref is enabled by default, I think it is important that we add it to the prefs GUI so that people can turn it off if they dont want to spam servers with favicon requests.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I am going to try to do this one myself with patchmaker... If I can figure it out :) CCing Hyatt, cause favicons are his baby.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
The favicon pref is not going to be exposed in the GUI. There is already a pref in the GUI for disabling/enabling custom icons.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Here is a nice simple patch to add the favicon pref to the gui It greys-out when the site_icon pref is disabled, and it uses a label that both the anti-favicon and pro-favicon camps can be happy about: "[X] Aggressively Seek Icons for All Sites"
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
re-opening so I can accept
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
d'oh! Why cant I accept this bug? I pick "Accept bug (change status to ASSIGNED)" and hit "Submit" but then it stays "UNCONFIRMED"
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Sorry, but producing a patch doesn't mean something necessary gets done...this won't be in the UI. Thanks, though, for making it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
uh... yeah... Can someone please either explain to me the rationalle of leaving this out of the GUI, or point me towards a bug or document or newsgroup where it has already been discussed? I am utterly baffled by this decision.
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
The favicon implememntation of mozilla uses the link tag as far as I know. IE way of try anyway even if not mentioned on the webpage isn't used in mozilla as far as I know. So no pref is needed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
jesse: Nope, Im afraid not. Mozilla has a pref to enable fetching favicon.ico from all sites. This pref was originally defaulted to OFF when the site-icons feature first landed, but now it has been changed to ON by default, so mozilla is currently requesting favicon.ico from every single site it visits. See bug 109843 for more info on that.
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Why doesn't this get a GUI? Because if we added GUI for every little UI nuance like this, our application would be 90 Mb. I assure you that nobody (*) cares about toggling this feature on or off. It's either on, or it's off. (* - where nobody = 99.99% of users)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
heh, okay, Im gonna call you on your math here :) This patch, which adds the gui for one checkbox with conditional disable/enable javascript adds about 620 bytes to the unjarred chrome. re-jarred, it adds 78 bytes. According to about:config my mozilla install has 790 prefs. Many of those already have guis, and many are handled by single guis, for example, 91 of those are just fonts. 44 are my mail servers. 29 are my mail identities, but just for the sake of example lets say 790 prefs. Now this is a pretty simple pref, so lets pretend that the average pref-gui is ten-times bigger than that. That sounds reasonably over-extreeme. So ~6200 bytes unjarred and ~ 780 bytes in the jar. Now if every single one of those 790 prefs gets a gui that big, we bloat the chrome by 4.9 mb unjarred and 616k in the jar. Thats all quite a terribly overextreme estimate, but I think it falls a bit short of 90 megabytes :) Anyway, this bug doesnt ask for 616k, It asks for 78 bytes. (by way of trivia, this comment is 1299 bytes) I would be delighted to rewrite the patch to move the pref into the "Debug" panel instead of the "Appearance" panel, but I will respect the decision to WONTFIX this bug, because although I do not know who the appropriate module owner is, I know it aint me! :)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•