Closed
Bug 1119472
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
In-content Preferences, Text color of some text-link is not consistent. And it is difficult to discover them because no underline and low contrast.
Categories
(Firefox :: Settings UI, defect)
Firefox
Settings UI
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 38
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Assigned: jaws)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
130.08 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
1.09 KB,
patch
|
jaws
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
See attached screenshot. I notice the problem when I test another Bug 1119441. Steps to reproduce: 1. in-content preferences Actual Results: In-content Preferences, Text color of some text-link is not consistent. And it is difficult to discover them because no underline and low contrast. Expected Results: Text color of some text-link should be consistent. It should be easy discoverable (Ex. provide underline or more high-contrast.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
And hover effect is not consistent
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Looks like we can remove the rules from: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/themes/windows/preferences/preferences.css#89 http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/themes/linux/preferences/preferences.css#93 http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/themes/osx/preferences/preferences.css#191 for .inline-link. As for the contrast and the underline: Philipp, are you OK with us adding text-decoration:underline; to all links that share this common.css styling across the browser (http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/themes/shared/in-content/common.inc.css#392) and also using a darker color (#00539F?) ?
Flags: needinfo?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
I talked with Stephen over IRC and got the following answers: We should add the text-decoration:underline on link hover, and use #178ce5 as the darker color.
Flags: needinfo?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jared Wein [:jaws] (please needinfo? me) from comment #2) > Looks like we can remove the rules from: On further note, we shouldn't remove those lines as they were just added in bug 1106792. We should work with those lines or around them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
The presence of the namespace decreased the specificity of the selector to the point where the windowed preferences' styles were overriding. I never thought a namespace would decrease the specificity. I tested this with the windowed preferences and it doesn't regress there.
Assignee: nobody → jaws
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8552794 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8552794 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Review of attachment 8552794 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I'll buy that for a dollar. Thanks!
Attachment #8552794 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
renamed 1119472 -> 1119472.patch applying 1119472.patch patching file toolkit/themes/shared/in-content/common.inc.css Hunk #1 FAILED at 382 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file toolkit/themes/shared/in-content/common.inc.css.rej patch failed, unable to continue (try -v) patch failed, rejects left in working dir errors during apply, please fix and refresh 1119472.patch jaws: could you take a look at this ? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(jaws)
Keywords: checkin-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
This patch was based off of a patch that hadn't landed yet, but has landed now. I just pulled latest and applied this patch and it applied with no failures. Can you please try again?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8552794 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8554641 -
Flags: review+
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/3ab0e70121c9
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [fixed-in-fx-team]
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3ab0e70121c9
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed-in-fx-team]
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 38
Updated•9 years ago
|
QA Contact: camelia.badau
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed on Windows 7 64bit and Ubuntu 13.10 32bit using Firefox 38 Beta 6 (buildID: 20150420134330). I still see the issue on Mac OSX 10.9.5 using Firefox 38 Beta 6 (buildID: 20150420134330): text color of some text-link is not consistent (see "Privacy" tab -> text-link from "History" section). Should I reopen this bug?
Flags: needinfo?(jaws)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
This was fixed on Windows, though, and remains fixed on beta. I'd prefer a new bug for the OSX issue, which is also less severe than the windows issue in the screenshot here.
Flags: needinfo?(jaws)
Flags: needinfo?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Flags: needinfo?(camelia.badau)
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch (mostly away until May 5th) from comment #13) > This was fixed on Windows, though, and remains fixed on beta. I'd prefer a > new bug for the OSX issue, which is also less severe than the windows issue > in the screenshot here. I filled bug 1159707 for the OSX issue. Marking this bug as VERIFIED FIXED.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: needinfo?(camelia.badau)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•