Closed
Bug 1122013
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[stage][regression] Signature reports do not load
Categories
(Socorro :: General, task)
Socorro
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mbrandt, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [fromAutomation][regression][stage])
Attachments
(1 file)
133.57 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
Signature reports appear to not be loading on stage. Steps to reproduce: 1. goto https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/list?product=Firefox&range_value=7&range_unit=days&date=2015-01-15&signature=OOM+|+small&version=Firefox%3A34.0#tab-reports 2. select any crash Expected: Report loads Actual: "Crash Not Found" - https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/index/93c7e92a-2068-4c20-9922-765032150108
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
The crashes on the report page appeared to be from 1/8, a week ago. I was able to load a report from the last 3 days: https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/index/716a2478-0753-4d6e-bf73-956d62150112 Maybe :rhelmer can shed some light on this?
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Selena Deckelmann :selenamarie :selena from comment #1) > The crashes on the report page appeared to be from 1/8, a week ago. > > I was able to load a report from the last 3 days: > https://crash-stats.allizom.org/report/index/716a2478-0753-4d6e-bf73- > 956d62150112 > > Maybe :rhelmer can shed some light on this? The production Postgres DB is copied to stage on a weekly basis, but the prod and stage S3 buckets are not synched. I'm not sure it's worth the cost and time to sync the prod/stage S3 buckets. Do you think we should keep doing the prod->stage sync thing, or just have them be independent?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
I'm mainly interested in ensuring the test coverage is good -- is there a good middle ground for keeping this data sync'd? Perhaps updating the test to only look at older reports?
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Matt Brandt [:mbrandt] from comment #3) > I'm mainly interested in ensuring the test coverage is good -- is there a > good middle ground for keeping this data sync'd? Perhaps updating the test > to only look at older reports? Disabling the postgres sync and just depending on submitted crashes would do this, but it's a lot less convenient. Let me see what the cost to do a full sync would be.
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robert Helmer [:rhelmer] from comment #4) > (In reply to Matt Brandt [:mbrandt] from comment #3) > > I'm mainly interested in ensuring the test coverage is good -- is there a > > good middle ground for keeping this data sync'd? Perhaps updating the test > > to only look at older reports? > > Disabling the postgres sync and just depending on submitted crashes would do > this, but it's a lot less convenient. > > Let me see what the cost to do a full sync would be. The current problem is that we're syncing prod PG -> stage PG, but not syncing S3 also (or ES for that matter, which will come up as we test supersearch more deeply) Per the meeting we just had (https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2015-q1-socorro-coverage-needs) let's leave PHX as-is, and solve this as we stand up AWS staging this quarter: * rebuild stage on AWS without and backend synching ** e.g. S3, PG, ES should all be standalone ** submitting crashes from prod to stage collector is OK
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Fixed; verified through automation in test_top_crasher_reports_tab_has_uuid_report.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•