Closed
Bug 113204
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Wishlist FAQ has become a historical relic
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
www.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: msimons69, Assigned: hsivonen)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 4 obsolete files)
10.22 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
This FAQ was last updated 1999-12-02. Based on my quick reading it appears that most things listed in the FAQ as not yet done have been done for months. (Crypto in main, Prevent Animations, PNG Alpha Support, etc). I suggest that this FAQ get updated or moved to a history section of the site. =)
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Yes, it is quite different now from when I wrote this. I no longer follow wishlist, or Mozilla too much for that matter, so we'd need to find someone who does to update this.
-> taking QA contact so I don't need to watch Dawn anymore. ;)
QA Contact: endico → imajes
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I want to update the Wishlist FAQ. I'm running http://wishlist.mozdev.org. :)
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
I want to update the Wishlist FAQ. I'm running http://wishlist.mozdev.org. :)
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 143988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 166707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
* Switched to HTML 4.01 Strict. The www.mozilla.org wrapper makes XHTML ill-formed. * Used dl instead of ol, since the numbering isn't important (IMO) and the issues come in issue-explanation pairs which can be represented as dt-dd pairs. (Note: the <dt>s will be bolded by persistent-style.css once the document is uploaded to www.mozilla.org.) * marked <blink> up as <code> * smartened quotes * fixed ampersands in URLs * used <code> instead of <blockquote> for a pref code example * Spelling edits: no-one -> no one fully-customizable -> fully customizable Pheonix -> Phoenix javascript -> JavaScript XML 1 -> XML 1.0 DOM 1 -> DOM Level 1 flash -> Flash java -> Java availabe -> available ministrator -> administrator * Edits to substance Mozilla currently has full support -> Mozilla currently supports (claiming full support is a can of worms) XSL -> XSLT (There are no plans to support XSL-FO) SVG support -> Partial SVG support removed MS remarks from the MHTML answer changed wording regarding Mozilla versions to allowd more timelessness in the answer concerning mail and news filters added link to http://www.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html#alttooltip Daniel Wang, Matthew Tuck, is this OK for check-in?
Attachment #107562 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #107563 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Taking bug since the default assignee hasn't commented.
Assignee: endico → hsivonen
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
Removed a useless <style> element I forgot to remove before attaching the previous version.
Attachment #117316 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
looks fine to me :-)
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
> Mozilla currently supports W3C HTML 4.01, XML 1.0, CSS 1, and DOM > Level 1 and partial support for CSS 2, DOM 2 and 3, XSLT, XLink, and > MathML. Partial SVG support is availabe but is not compiled into > Mozilla releases. I don't quite understand why this information is in a "Wishlist FAQ"... In general, there seem several entries here which say "Mozilla has feature X." If it has this feature, it can't be a wishlist item. Also, if this document is a FAQ, why is it not structured like one? :-) > Advertisement Blockers > > There are various ways you can do this already, and it will probably > possible to write a Mozilla plugin to do this. There is one - http://bannerblind.mozdev.org . > However, this proposal > is 1) unethical and 2) unimplementable as an open source organization > like Mozilla.org could not and should not discriminate what content > is acceptable or unacceptable to the user. Hence it is unlikely this > will every appear in Mozilla or Communicator. See http://www.mozilla.org/README-style.html under "Speak for yourself". You should not be declaring things "unethical" in a mozilla.org-hosted document, or making statements about mozilla.org policy. Please replace this paragraph with a link to bannerblind, plus optionally a paragraph which begins "However, before installing this software, you might like to consider that some websites rely on advertising revenue..." > Support for mouse button 4 and 5 is being worked on, and with some > luck should be implemented in Mozilla 1.3 (see bug 30431). Well, were they? :-) In general, it's good not to promise features by specific releases. Keyboard > Shortcut Customisation > > It is currently not possible to customise keyboard shortcuts. The > relevent bug is bug 57805) and we need help on implementing this > feature. Surely this is true of most features on this page? > Mozilla currently does not support AutoScroll (Panning) navigation, > which in Internet Explorer is activated by pressing down the middle > mouse button and draging the cursor and in other applications is a > ‘hand’ cursor. Because there is no apparent standard on how > AutoScroll is implemented, this enhancement still needs some > discussion (see bug 22775 (AutoScroll)). Why does this bug have "AutoScroll" next to it when other buglinks have no similar designation? > Turn Off <Blink> > > There is currently no direct support for this in Mozilla, however, it > is possible to do this with a user CSS stylesheet. Link to instructions? Gerv
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
I've been following the wishlist page (off-and-on) for a while now. The reason for those "Mozilla has feature X" bits is likely to be pure archaeology. Also, it'd be nice to have a page of "frequently requested Mozilla features that already exist". Mozilla is so big that some of the more interesting features are buried behind the normal everyday features. [short digression on ad blocking] I agree with keeping the ethical issues of blocking ads off of the wishlist page. There are several sites that both depend on ad revenue, and don't care that much if you block ads on that site. There are people who are so easily distracted by flashing bouncing <blink>ing things that they'd have trouble getting useful work done on the current web without blocking ads. It's a bit pointless to argue about whether ad blocking should be implemented, since there are several ways of doing it now. The cat's out of the bag. [end digression] I think the wishlist should be a list of oft-requested features that either a) exist already, b) require much work to implement, or c) will never be implemented due to architecture issues. Perhaps sorted by number of requests, or which of the categories the feature fits. For features that exist already, there should be some pointer to how to access them. For "much work required" features, some indication of what sort of work is needed would be useful (code, art, whatever). For features denied by design, if it's possible to explain why quickly, it should be on the page. If it's too complicated to explain, perhaps a pointer to another doc would be good. After thinking about this for a bit, I can see why the wishlist doesn't get updated very often. Too many questions, and Mozilla gets updated so fast that it is difficult to keep up with which features have been implemented already. Hence the usefulness of putting a link to a bug in, so that a user could check things.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
Attachment #117317 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
> I don't quite understand why this information is in a "Wishlist FAQ"... In > general, there seem several entries here which say "Mozilla has feature X." > If it has this feature, it can't be a wishlist item. Fixed. > Also, if this document is a FAQ, why is it not structured like one? :-) It isn't a FAQ, but let's keep the URL. > See http://www.mozilla.org/README-style.html under "Speak for yourself". > You should not be declaring things "unethical" in a mozilla.org-hosted > document Yes, I should have done something about it earlier. Fixed. > In general, it's good not to promise features by specific > releases. Fixed. > Surely this is true of most features on this page? Fixed. > Link to instructions? Added inline.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
Checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
http://wiki.mozdev.org:8080/cgi-bin/mozdev-wiki.pl?WishlistFAQ Wishlist FAQ at MozDev.org is now availiable on Wiki, meaning anyone can edit it. I'm not totally done in porting over the information from the original Wishlist site. Also, references to Phoenix will probably have to be change to Firebird (the tentative offical new name.) Furthermore, customizable toolbars wish should be changed, since the Mozilla suite will be broken up, and the Firebird will become the browser, and Minotaur (Thunderbird) will become the mail client.
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
v should add tabbed browser bug 104778 delete attachment bug 2920 a "all bugs listed here" link would be nice
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•