Closed Bug 1149495 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Assertion failure: isInt32(), at ../../dist/include/js/Value.h:1212 with runOffThreadScript

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla40
Tracking Status
firefox40 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: decoder, Assigned: fitzgen)

Details

(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase, Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:update])

Attachments

(1 file)

The following testcase crashes on mozilla-central revision 8af276ab8636 (build with --enable-optimize --enable-posix-nspr-emulation --enable-valgrind --enable-gczeal --disable-tests --enable-debug, run with --fuzzing-safe --thread-count=2):

offThreadCompileScript('Error()', { lineNumber: (4294967295)});
runOffThreadScript().stack;



Backtrace:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000006a259c in JS::Value::toInt32 (this=<optimized out>) at ../../dist/include/js/Value.h:1212
#0  0x00000000006a259c in JS::Value::toInt32 (this=<optimized out>) at ../../dist/include/js/Value.h:1212
#1  0x00000000006aeec8 in toInt32 (this=<optimized out>) at js/src/vm/SavedStacks.cpp:259
#2  js::SavedFrame::getLine (this=<optimized out>) at js/src/vm/SavedStacks.cpp:258
#3  0x00000000006c17e9 in JS::BuildStackString (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, stack=..., stack@entry=..., stringp=..., stringp@entry=...) at js/src/vm/SavedStacks.cpp:669
#4  0x00000000006240c0 in js::ErrorObject::getStack (cx=0x7ffff691b4e0, argc=<optimized out>, vp=<optimized out>) at js/src/vm/ErrorObject.cpp:213
#5  0x0000000000674912 in js::CallJSNative (cx=0x7ffff691b4e0, native=0x623f10 <js::ErrorObject::getStack(JSContext*, unsigned int, JS::Value*)>, args=...) at js/src/jscntxtinlines.h:235
#6  0x0000000000663943 in js::Invoke (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, args=..., construct=construct@entry=js::NO_CONSTRUCT) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:470
#7  0x0000000000665403 in js::Invoke (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, thisv=..., fval=..., argc=argc@entry=0, argv=argv@entry=0x0, rval=..., rval@entry=...) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:526
#8  0x0000000000668eb0 in js::InvokeGetter (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, obj=0x7ffff5262100, fval=..., rval=rval@entry=...) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:595
#9  0x00000000006d170e in CallGetter (vp=..., shape=..., receiver=..., cx=0x7ffff691b4e0) at js/src/vm/NativeObject.cpp:1635
#10 GetExistingProperty<(js::AllowGC)1> (cx=0x7ffff691b4e0, receiver=..., obj=..., shape=..., vp=...) at js/src/vm/NativeObject.cpp:1685
#11 0x00000000006d1bd2 in NativeGetPropertyInline<(js::AllowGC)1> (cx=0x7ffff691b4e0, obj=..., receiver=..., id=..., nameLookup=nameLookup@entry=NotNameLookup, vp=...) at js/src/vm/NativeObject.cpp:1899
#12 0x00000000006d1fb0 in js::NativeGetProperty (cx=<optimized out>, obj=..., receiver=..., id=..., vp=...) at js/src/vm/NativeObject.cpp:1933
#13 0x00000000004fd570 in js::GetProperty (cx=<optimized out>, obj=..., receiver=..., id=..., vp=...) at js/src/vm/NativeObject.h:1439
#14 0x00000000006573f9 in GetPropertyOperation (vp=..., lval=..., pc=<optimized out>, script=..., fp=<optimized out>, cx=0x7ffff691b4e0) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:260
#15 Interpret (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, state=...) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:2406
#16 0x00000000006636a8 in js::RunScript (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, state=...) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:420
#17 0x000000000066a756 in js::ExecuteKernel (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, script=..., script@entry=..., scopeChainArg=..., thisv=..., type=type@entry=js::EXECUTE_GLOBAL, evalInFrame=..., evalInFrame@entry=..., result=result@entry=0x0) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:636
#18 0x000000000066c800 in js::Execute (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, script=script@entry=..., scopeChainArg=..., rval=rval@entry=0x0) at js/src/vm/Interpreter.cpp:679
#19 0x0000000000a45b9e in ExecuteScript (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, obj=..., scriptArg=..., rval=rval@entry=0x0) at js/src/jsapi.cpp:4089
#20 0x0000000000a45d1b in JS_ExecuteScript (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, scriptArg=..., scriptArg@entry=...) at js/src/jsapi.cpp:4111
#21 0x00000000004253b3 in RunFile (compileOnly=false, file=0x7ffff699b800, filename=0x7fffffffdf75 "min.js", cx=0x7ffff691b4e0) at js/src/shell/js.cpp:466
#22 Process (cx=cx@entry=0x7ffff691b4e0, filename=0x7fffffffdf75 "min.js", forceTTY=forceTTY@entry=false) at js/src/shell/js.cpp:597
#23 0x0000000000472033 in ProcessArgs (op=0x7fffffffd9d0, cx=0x7ffff691b4e0) at js/src/shell/js.cpp:5777
#24 Shell (envp=<optimized out>, op=0x7fffffffd9d0, cx=0x7ffff691b4e0) at js/src/shell/js.cpp:6043
#25 main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, envp=<optimized out>) at js/src/shell/js.cpp:6385
rax	0x0	0
rbx	0x7ffff691b4e0	140737330132192
rcx	0x7ffff6ca53cd	140737333842893
rdx	0x0	0
rsi	0x7ffff6f7a9d0	140737336814032
rdi	0x7ffff6f791c0	140737336807872
rbp	0x7fffffffbf30	140737488338736
rsp	0x7fffffffbf30	140737488338736
r8	0x7ffff7fe0780	140737354008448
r9	0x7ffff51e30a0	140737305784480
r10	0x7fffffffbcf0	140737488338160
r11	0x7ffff6c27960	140737333328224
r12	0x7fffffffc080	140737488339072
r13	0x0	0
r14	0x489af0	4758256
r15	0x7fffffffc020	140737488338976
rip	0x6a259c <JS::Value::toInt32() const+28>
=> 0x6a259c <JS::Value::toInt32() const+28>:	movl   $0x4bc,0x0
   0x6a25a7 <JS::Value::toInt32() const+39>:	callq  0x423140 <abort@plt>


Likely a shell-only issue.
Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:update,bisect] → [jsbugmon:update]
JSBugMon: Bisection requested, result:
=== Treeherder Build Bisection Results by autoBisect ===

The "good" changeset has the timestamp "20150327125918" and the hash "d56c2eb468f6".
The "bad" changeset has the timestamp "20150327131017" and the hash "b336dc0af92c".

Likely regression window: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=d56c2eb468f6&tochange=b336dc0af92c
Needinfo from fitzgen based on comment 1.
Flags: needinfo?(nfitzgerald)
Flags: needinfo?(nfitzgerald)
Assignee: nobody → nfitzgerald
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 8588368 [details] [diff] [review]
SavedFrame objects should handle all uint32 values.

Review of attachment 8588368 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Looks simple enough, though I'd like the answers to the questions before I r+.

::: js/src/vm/SavedStacks.cpp
@@ +254,5 @@
>  uint32_t
>  SavedFrame::getLine()
>  {
>      const Value& v = getReservedSlot(JSSLOT_LINE);
> +    return v.toPrivateUint32();

Are SavedFrame exposed elsewhere? How do you guarantee that this doesn't get erroneously interpreted as an int32?

@@ +308,5 @@
>      MOZ_ASSERT(getReservedSlot(JSSLOT_SOURCE).isUndefined());
>      setReservedSlot(JSSLOT_SOURCE, StringValue(lookup->source));
>  
> +    setReservedSlot(JSSLOT_LINE, PrivateUint32Value(lookup->line));
> +    setReservedSlot(JSSLOT_COLUMN, PrivateUint32Value(lookup->column));

How are lines and columns guaranteed to be within uint32 range?
Attachment #8588368 - Flags: review?(shu)
(In reply to Shu-yu Guo [:shu] from comment #4)
> Are SavedFrame exposed elsewhere? How do you guarantee that this doesn't get
> erroneously interpreted as an int32?

Things should only be accessing the reserved slots through SavedFrame::getFoo helpers.

> How are lines and columns guaranteed to be within uint32 range?

For some reason, I was under the impression that PCToLineNumber returned uint32_t but that no longer seems to be the case and blame is telling me that it probably never was the case.

What would you suggest doing here?
Comment on attachment 8588368 [details] [diff] [review]
SavedFrame objects should handle all uint32 values.

Re-requesting review as requested on IRC
Attachment #8588368 - Flags: review?(shu)
(In reply to Nick Fitzgerald [:fitzgen] from comment #5)
> (In reply to Shu-yu Guo [:shu] from comment #4)
> > Are SavedFrame exposed elsewhere? How do you guarantee that this doesn't get
> > erroneously interpreted as an int32?
> 
> Things should only be accessing the reserved slots through
> SavedFrame::getFoo helpers.
> 
> > How are lines and columns guaranteed to be within uint32 range?
> 
> For some reason, I was under the impression that PCToLineNumber returned
> uint32_t but that no longer seems to be the case and blame is telling me
> that it probably never was the case.
> 
> What would you suggest doing here?

We would have other problems if it overflowed uint32. In practice I wouldn't worry. Famous last words...
Attachment #8588368 - Flags: review?(shu) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bbe22e6e4e67
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla40
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: