Closed
Bug 1177146
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has more data than expected
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: edgar, Assigned: edgar)
References
Details
(Keywords: foxfood)
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
06-23 11:50:52.937 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Handling parcel as REQUEST_QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): Rogers Wireless 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): lte 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): available 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): Rogers Wireless 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): lte 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: [0] Error processing operator tuple: Error: Invalid network tuple (should be 5 or 6 digits): available 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 783 I Gecko : RIL Worker: Next parcel size unknown, going to sleep. 06-23 11:50:52.957 317 317 I Gecko : -*- RadioInterface[0]: Received message from worker: {"rilMessageClientId":0,"rilMessageToken":254,"rilMessageType":"getAvailableNetworks","rilRequestType":48,"networks":[{"longName":"Bell","shortName":"Bell","mcc":"302","mnc":"610","state":"available"},{"longName":"wcdma","shortName":"TELUS","mcc":"TEL","mnc":"US"},{"longName":"available","shortName":"wcdma","mcc":null,"mnc":null},{"longName":"302720","shortName":"available","mcc":null,"mnc":null},{"longName":"RogersWireless","shortName":"302720","mcc":null,"mnc":null},{"longName":"WIND","shortName":"WIND","mcc":"302","mnc":"490","state":"forbidden"},{"longName":"wcdma","shortName":"Rogers Wireless","mcc":null,"mnc":null},{"longName":"available","shortName":"gsm","mcc":"TEL","mnc":"US"},{"longName":"302220","shortName":"available","mcc":null,"mnc":null},{"longName":"Bell","shortName":"302610","mcc":null,"mnc":null}]}
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: [Aries][RIL] Unable to QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS → [Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has more data than expected
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
That's a workaround I have on my gecko
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → echen
Flags: needinfo?(echen)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
And we need a new quirk for this extra field.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8630834 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: [Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has extra strings, v2 Review of attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Hsinyi, In this patch, I add a new quirk, "ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str", for the extra string in the response of QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS on z3c. And also do some clean-up for other quirks, Could you please help to review this? Thank you
Attachment #8630836 -
Flags: review?(htsai)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630835 [details] [review] Part 2: Add mozril quirk ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str to shinano-common Hi Alexandre, I add a new quirk, "ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str", for the extra string in the response of QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS for z3c. Could you please help to review this? Thank you.
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: review?(lissyx+mozillians)
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630835 [details] [review] Part 2: Add mozril quirk ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str to shinano-common I'm not a big fan of the name :). Why making it "obscured" ? Anyway, and I don't know why there is this behavior in the KK Sony blobs, but it looks obvious there is a pattern of extending some of the RIL replies. So maybe, instead of landing a new property each time, we should have a more generic one? We already have the use for the extra string present, and for the extra field in the signal level. What's your opinion Hsin-Yi ? If you consider we should keep two separates properties, let's go with r+ after renaming the property to something less obscure, like "avlbl_nw_extra_str" => "available_networks_extra_str" ?
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: review?(lissyx+mozillians)
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: feedback?(htsai)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #10) > Comment on attachment 8630835 [details] [review] > Part 2: Add mozril quirk ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str to shinano-common > > I'm not a big fan of the name :). Why making it "obscured" ? It is because there is a limitation for the length of property name [1], the max length is 32. `ro.moz.ril.available_networks_extra_str` is too long, so I use the abbreviated version. :p [1] https://github.com/android/platform_bionic/blob/lollipop-mr1-release/libc/include/sys/system_properties.h#L38
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #10) > Comment on attachment 8630835 [details] [review] > Part 2: Add mozril quirk ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str to shinano-common > > I'm not a big fan of the name :). Why making it "obscured" ? > > Anyway, and I don't know why there is this behavior in the KK Sony blobs, > but it looks obvious there is a pattern of extending some of the RIL > replies. So maybe, instead of landing a new property each time, we should > have a more generic one? > > We already have the use for the extra string present, and for the extra > field in the signal level. > > What's your opinion Hsin-Yi ? If you consider we should keep two separates > properties, let's go with r+ after renaming the property to something less > obscure, like "avlbl_nw_extra_str" => "available_networks_extra_str" ? The quirks we used to have were defined by "feature" not specifically by "device." However, I tend to thinking that quirk by device might make the code looks clearer in this case. So having a shinano-specific quirk sounds a good idea to me. Just one thing to note, if we want to have that shinano quirk, we should not keep using the existing "ro.moz.ril.signal_extra_int", we should have a new name, instead.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: feedback?(htsai)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #12) > The quirks we used to have were defined by "feature" not specifically by > "device." However, I tend to thinking that quirk by device might make the > code looks clearer in this case. So having a shinano-specific quirk sounds a > good idea to me. Just one thing to note, if we want to have that shinano > quirk, we should not keep using the existing "ro.moz.ril.signal_extra_int", > we should have a new name, instead. What about reusing the existed property `ro.product.device` for device quirk? Then we don't need to introduce a new property. But note that Z3 and Z3C has different device name. If we reuse this as device quirk, we have to check both of them. The value of `ro.product.device` in different devices: - Z3 --> "shinano" - Z3C --> "aries" - Nexus-5 --> "hammerhead"
Flags: needinfo?(htsai)
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] from comment #13) > (In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #12) > > The quirks we used to have were defined by "feature" not specifically by > > "device." However, I tend to thinking that quirk by device might make the > > code looks clearer in this case. So having a shinano-specific quirk sounds a > > good idea to me. Just one thing to note, if we want to have that shinano > > quirk, we should not keep using the existing "ro.moz.ril.signal_extra_int", > > we should have a new name, instead. > > What about reusing the existed property `ro.product.device` for device > quirk? Then we don't need to introduce a new property. But note that Z3 and > Z3C has different device name. If we reuse this as device quirk, we have to > check both of them. > > The value of `ro.product.device` in different devices: > - Z3 --> "shinano" > - Z3C --> "aries" > - Nexus-5 --> "hammerhead" Sounds good to me :)
Flags: needinfo?(htsai)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: [Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has extra strings, v2 Review of attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I am going to address comment #13, so cancel the review first. Thank you, Hsinyi and Alexandre.
Attachment #8630836 -
Flags: review?(htsai)
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
Edgar, I'm against this approach because it should be specific to KK Sony's blobs. As far as we could cross check, blobs provided by Sony AOSP Lollipop won't have those extra fields. I do have recent builds to share if you need to investigate.
Flags: needinfo?(echen)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #16) > Edgar, I'm against this approach because it should be specific to KK Sony's > blobs. As far as we could cross check, blobs provided by Sony AOSP Lollipop > won't have those extra fields. I do have recent builds to share if you need > to investigate. Please share it to me, I can take a look. Thank you. I thought `ro.product.device` is a generic property which is generated by android build system [1]. And the value is from the PRODUCT_DEVICE[2] defined in .mk file. [1] http://androidxref.com/5.1.1_r6/xref/build/tools/buildinfo.sh#23 [2] https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/device-sony-aries/blob/sony-aosp-l/aries.mk#L18
Flags: needinfo?(echen) → needinfo?(lissyx+mozillians)
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] from comment #17) > (In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #16) > > Edgar, I'm against this approach because it should be specific to KK Sony's > > blobs. As far as we could cross check, blobs provided by Sony AOSP Lollipop > > won't have those extra fields. I do have recent builds to share if you need > > to investigate. > > Please share it to me, I can take a look. Thank you. > > I thought `ro.product.device` is a generic property which is generated by > android build system [1]. > And the value is from the PRODUCT_DEVICE[2] defined in .mk file. > > [1] http://androidxref.com/5.1.1_r6/xref/build/tools/buildinfo.sh#23 > [2] > https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/device-sony-aries/blob/sony-aosp-l/aries. > mk#L18 That's exactly the point: product device is not enough to discriminate between KK and L :)
Flags: needinfo?(lissyx+mozillians)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #16) > Edgar, I'm against this approach because it should be specific to KK Sony's > blobs. As far as we could cross check, blobs provided by Sony AOSP Lollipop > won't have those extra fields. I do have recent builds to share if you need > to investigate. (In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #18) > That's exactly the point: product device is not enough to discriminate > between KK and L :) I have checked the aries-l build, it doesn't have those extra fields (in both signal and available network), so using `ro.product.device` isn't a proper way for sure. Due to this, I would like to go back to the original proposal: define quirk by "feature" which seems a simpler and clearer way to me. Thank you.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: [Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has extra strings, v2 Review of attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- According to comment #19, may I have your review again? Thank you.
Attachment #8630836 -
Flags: review?(htsai)
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630835 [details] [review] Part 2: Add mozril quirk ro.moz.ril.avlbl_nw_extra_str to shinano-common comment 19 makes sense to me!
Attachment #8630835 -
Flags: feedback+
Updated•9 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [foxfood-triage]
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: [Aries][RIL] Reply from QUERY_AVAILABLE_NETWORKS has extra strings, v2 Review of attachment 8630836 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ship it!
Attachment #8630836 -
Flags: review?(htsai) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
Try result: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=80f68f2dc13c&exclusion_profile=false
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
Master: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/device-shinano-common/commit/6698c2a6aa4115f00b1f25fec32f10b2c5c2f454
Keywords: checkin-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ad35e6706f9b
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•