1184341 - spam

Comment hidden (abuse, spam)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.134 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce:

You think that you help to make the best browser in the world?
It is really so.
Mozilla task is to make better for the people.

But is it possible to make better for people by force, by torture, by humiliation and bullying?
Or some people at the expense of others people?

Once in the USSR, some people believed that the state knows better how many tomatoes and cucumbers need to each particular person.
It turned out to be a mistake.
Would you like to help the officials of the USSR?
We would not want to help such officials.

Now Mozilla has decided that it knows best what and how FireFox extensions the people can use, and what and how the people cannot use.
As the developer of the extension, now I'll have to compile FireFox just to use their extension.

Officials Mozilla actually have not listen to us. It's just torture.
They were warned about all the problems. But in the end did what is not justified on any things.
For example, Mozilla blocked the AMO beta-channels for fully reviewed extensions. With that, then they're going to open them again.
It is not justified absolutely nothing.
Here already as 1.5 years I am saying that the situation with the time of the AMO review is invalid.
However, Mozilla is introducing even more complex and time-consuming procedure review, although Mozilla not the way to maintain the proper level of even this.
People maintain the developing add-ons for free. And get Mozilla all to stop their development.
To humiliate these people. Mozilla make it impossible for even a simple test for the extensions. (FireFox DE is not suitable for this)

This is the openness of FireFox? Internet freedom? Respect for users and developers?

Mozilla officials just don't listen to any arguments and don't even think about how to faithfully fulfil at least their own decisions.

Helping for Mozilla now, you help for the mad officials.
You are harming to people.
You're helping to torture and bullying under extension developers.
You are help to make evil.

I write this only because FireFox is a really good browser. I don't want to use another!
Help me as you can.
Stop you work. Do not help Mozilla to bear evil and turn from a good company at a mad officials like the deceased USSR.

It depends on each. It depends on you.
There are no excuses for condoning of torture.
Bad case cannot be justified by anything. Neither the problems nor a benefit to society.

Copy of the previous mail for the some mozilla members
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

cbeard@mozilla.org, ben@mozilla.org, mbrubeck@mozilla.com, mgrimes@mozilla.com, myk@mozilla.org
Mozilla policies
Hello

Below in this letter you can find information for the following issues:
1. The Mozilla communication policy with other people is offensive and ineffective. It brings to rabies and harms the health (I had a hypertensive crisis).
2. The AMO extensions review policy is well, but its implementation is offensive and unacceptable about prevent of the extensions development.
3. The extensions signing policy is bad, and its implementation make an unacceptable obstacle for the extensions developers. This policy is unprofessional implemented.

In advance I apologize, if it's not interesting. However, the policy of Mozilla does not allow me to make it to the competent specialists. At the same time, Mozilla causes me considerable moral and material harm. I am compelled to appeal to the greatest number of people, so the problem became known.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Turning to the support specialist of any company, I expect he intends to solve the problem if possible and appropriate. I also expect that if this is not possible, then specialist tell to explain to me why and how can I minimize the damage.
If I developing the FireFox extension, I expect that Mozilla will not interfere with me to the extension development. Because it is profitable for Mozilla.
Also I expect the understanding that I work for free. Which means they have the very limited resources, and it is a personal resources. I spend my life for the extension development.

However, Mozilla is doing the opposite.

For example.
1) for a recent discussion of the new policy of the extension signing, the developer community have been specified in advance all the problems that arose later in its implementation. However, nobody listened to the developers. And issues that have been predicted, there was really.
2) Mozilla is in no way took into account the opinion of the developers, nor the degree of the harm inflicted. Not even bothering to explain what critical reason has forced Mozilla to do so. I don't think the explanation about the increase in security FireFox here may be the true explanation. Because the harm to developers far more than any benefit from the introduction of the new policy (see 3. item).
3) AMO editors constantly demanding for me the requirements that are not described (clearly or generally) in AMO extensions review policy.
Obviously, if AMO required any requirements for me, I should be able to know in advance about the availability of these requirements. Otherwise I can't do them.
For example, if AMO required for me to make the test plan of extension, this requirement should be clearly described. Otherwise I imposed unreasonable demands, as if it was my fault that I did not provide this plan. (And what could be the test plan, if AMO declares that reads all the code of the extension??? How do they read?)
4) Some of the requirements should not be submitted. For example, the requirement to replace the nsIObserverService to sdk/system/events. There is no harm for using nsIObserverService. The developer determines what interfaces it uses. However, AMO editors believe that they can interfere in the creative process of the extension developing.
5) Not everyone is equal before the Mozilla policy. Known extensions are review faster. Simple extension (that is useless) passes review faster then a difficult extensions.
Some additions described violate policy Mozilla. Because they "allowed". However, many others cannot. Where such privileges?

I don't need to explain the reasons for such problems. Just decide them! These reasons are disposable.

There was no mechanism for complaints. So, complaints about inadequate requirements AMO editors to go Jorge Villalobos (must die).
Complaints about the harm of Mozilla's policies go to Jorge Villalobos (must die) too.
Complaints Jorge Villalobos go to Jorge Villalobos (must die) too.
However, he is not going to listen for arguments. Does not intend to amend the policy or to solve problems. He has "no time" for me. He has "thousands of add-ons". Why you need Jorge, if he has no time for anyone?
He is not going to listen. He is not going to solve the problem.
This man serves to pretend only that listening to me.

This will not work. I'm not stupid. I understand, when people listening to me, and when people make me to going.
Why would Mozilla to produce of enemies? You so want to them?

Conclusions:
1) Any action by authorised persons must be posiible to challenged by other authorised persons.
2) Don't make authorised persons who pretend to listen. But do not have the authority, ability and willingness.
3) Problems must have solve, and do not tell how difficult it to solve and their causes.
It are possible to resolving. If there are no people, then you must admit that there are no people. And to make the procedure to simpler.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Existing extension review policy does not update the add-on in good time. Updating them takes at least several months. I talking about useful extensions. That is about complex extensions.
1) AMO is unable to support the declared certification (review) policy for extensions.
2) AMO should to cancel the all extensions checks, except for security checks. Check is good, but AMO is unable to hold them.
3) As suggested by another person, if the AMO does not have time to certify the extension within 10 days, it should be published without certification (only for extensions with certificated versions).
4) The developer channel should work with automatic signature in any case (only for extensions with certificated versions). The lack of a developer channel makes it impossible to solve many problems.
5) If 10 days is too low, set a longer period, subject to item 3) .

Extension development impossible without it. Notice, the NoScript extension and the some other extensions obviously gets earlier reviews of other. And the only reason he lives.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.
To the extension signing must check only what you can really check. No statically check by regex for the preferences name. It can be bypassed.
I don't know what caused such a critical change in policy. Why are they so quick that there is no way to keep up with them. But, in any case, protecting some people, no need to kill others people.

I think that if the extension in AMO more than 1 year, then it is quite possible to enable automatic signing the developer channel.
The problem is too acute, to be neglected by developers.
Even I myself will soon not be able to use their own addition, if all of this continues to be so. DE and Nightly not meant for everyday use. But there is no other version, which would take unsigned extensions.

It, including, will affect the quality of testing extensions. Since before the publication of the extension, the developer will now not be able to use it independently in usual daily work. Thus, many errors will not be found by the developer and the users.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And again, people who participate in discussions by Mozilla, must be authoritative. Jorge Villalobos must die. He doesn't make decisions. And Jorge not qualified to evaluate what the developers say. He can't even explain why adopted one or the other.
He can only ban.
And no one person can do this. Or FireFox developers should make the complaint themselves or Mozilla will also, as before, to torment the extensions developers.

STOP MOCK ON THE EXTENSION DEVELOPERS!

Ask for help from everyone. Bullying and torturing under people is unacceptable!

END.

Actual results:

My extension has been died

Expected results:

AMO must die. Mozilla must die

3iqfuxjpsmt9

Reporter