Closed
Bug 1227534
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Document contributors' suggested path
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::UI Tests, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jlorenzo, Assigned: jlorenzo)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Now that we have more insight on the type of tasks, their difficulties, their scheduling, time to make this information public!
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
I created this first revision. A couple of example are missing. If you guys remember some of them, or if you want to change the example already there, feel free!
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(npark)
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(martijn.martijn)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page
Asking also Marcia, just to make sure we're in line with the participation program.
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(mozillamarcia.knous)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page
made minor edits. looks good, except the mention of using plivo, which can be removed.
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(npark) → review+
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page
It looks good to me too.
But if we're switching over to MarionetteJS, how useful would it be for contributors to work on this?
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(martijn.martijn) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to No-Jun Park [:njpark] from comment #3) > except the mention of using plivo, which can be removed. Right. Done. (In reply to Martijn Wargers [:mwargers] (QA) from comment #4) > But if we're switching over to MarionetteJS, how useful would it be for > contributors to work on this? IMO, the example will be outdated, but not flow would be still valid. Do you think anything else would need update?
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Adding mermi in case she wants to add any feedback.
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
I forgot to add in the previous comment that right now we don't have anything formalized around contribution paths with the Participation Team, so I think we can architect our own path here for now. I will take a look at this before Mozlando and weigh in with any other comments.
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
I made a few grammatical edits on the page. The other comment I would have - we reference "main contributors" but how is someone supposed to know who to ask in the channel? We should probably link that back to a page that describes what everyone on the team works on.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marcia Knous [:marcia - use ni] from comment #8) > We should probably link that back to a page that describes what everyone on the team works on. Good thinking, I made the change. Thanks
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review?(mozillamarcia.knous) → review-
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8691400 -
Flags: review- → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
Was published at https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/QA/Automation/UI/How_to_contribute
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•