Closed
Bug 1229990
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
See Also: support Flyspray trackers
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, enhancement)
Bugzilla
Creating/Changing Bugs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 577847
People
(Reporter: vapier, Assigned: vapier)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.82 KB,
patch
|
gerv
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the Flyspray tracker is used by some projects like Arch Linux
Attachment #8695061 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Attachment #8695061 -
Flags: review?(glob) → review?(gerv)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8695061 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-MoreBugUrl-add-Flyspray-support.patch Review of attachment 8695061 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: extensions/MoreBugUrl/lib/Flyspray.pm @@ +20,5 @@ > +sub should_handle { > + my ($class, $uri) = @_; > + > + # Flyspray URLs look like the following: > + # https://bugs.flyspray.org/task/1237 Won't this never get called because the Savane matcher will match first? Gerv ::: extensions/MoreBugUrl/template/en/default/hook/global/user-error-bug_url_invalid_tracker.html.tmpl @@ +15,4 @@ > <li>An issue in a Redmine installation.</li> > <li>A b[% %]ug in a Savane installation.</li> > <li>A task in a Phabricator installation.</li> > +<li>A task on a Flyspray tracking system.</li> "in a", not "on a".
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8695061 -
Flags: review?(gerv) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Savane trackers have a ? delimiter while flyspray do not, so this match should be fine. https://bugs.flyspray.org/task/1237 https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?107657
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Frysinger from comment #2) > Savane trackers have a ? delimiter while flyspray do not, so this match > should be fine. > > https://bugs.flyspray.org/task/1237 > https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?107657 Well, OK, although this rather points up the fragileness of this particular method of URL allocation... Fix the other thing and r=gerv. gerv
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gervase Markham [:gerv] from comment #3) sure, but the URL matching is fundamental to the current See Also logic. the issue isn't really specific to any module. the alternative would be to just allow all URLs as suggested in other bugs ...
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8695061 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8708503 -
Flags: review?(gerv)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8708503 -
Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
Updated•5 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•