1260892 - release promotion checksums file doesn't list filenames in same format as candidates or releases dir equivalent

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1160385

(Release Engineering :: Release Automation: Other, defect)

Description

[Jordan Lund (:jlund)]

e.g.

* uses version without 'b${num}': https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/SHA512SUMS
* uses version with 'b${num}': https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/SHA512SUMS

Comment 1

[Jordan Lund (:jlund)]

(In reply to Jordan Lund (:jlund) from comment #0)
> e.g.
> 
> * uses version without 'b${num}':
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/SHA512SUMS
> * uses version with 'b${num}':
> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/SHA512SUMS

second link paste fail..

comment 0 should be:

* uses version without 'b${num}': https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/SHA512SUMS
* uses version with 'b${num}': https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0b5/win32/en-US/

Comment 3

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Pushed something to test using jamun: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/jamun/rev/7404c393ba11

Comment 4

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

+ some follow up: https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/jamun/rev/53d492c072bb05e639c9b0e74f58e8a7d8e07ef6

Comment 7

[Nick Thomas [:nthomas] (UTC+12)]

https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html has some explanation and a work around for anyone relying on SHA512SUMS for Firefox 46.0.

Comment 8

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

I pushed the patches as a part of bug 1160385. It should work in next releases (46.0.1 and 47.0b2)