Closed
Bug 1305124
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Start running mochitest-a11y with e10s enabled in automation
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: aes+)
Now that Aaron is getting close to getting e10s a11y support ready for widespread testing, we need to get automated tests running in automation. Explicit non-goal for this bug: splitting up non-e10s mochitest-other across all platforms. We should probably consider doing that soon to avoid confusion, but we can take care of this bug without having to do that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
To the people CCed: feel free to add any other deps you want.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Getting this running on Taskcluster is apparently trivial. So that's awesome. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=2e09e0469bf62bafe4b72e7bef3f1c6092072ff7
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
except that is linux only- but a start!
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Yeah, good enough for ensuring that they're not completely and utterly broken before I embark on the buildbot end of things.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Blocks: e10s-tests
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
This got held up a bit by questions about how useful M-e10s(a11y) would actually be. I'll try to work on it soon, though.
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Finally got Linux working with some hacks. And they're currently busted. https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=29806780&repo=try Though I'm still a bit confused about what I'm seeing in the logs. As expected, the beginning of the run shows "runtests.py | Running with e10s: True" in the logs, but at the end of the run, I still see "INFO Mode: non-e10s". Not entirely sure what to make of that :\
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
After a number of discussions with various accessibility people, the unanimous conclusion is that there isn't any value in trying to stand up M-e10s(a11y). It won't effectively test cross-process things anyway and time is better-spent on adding more browser-chrome tests to the ones that are already there.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•