Closed
Bug 134137
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Tp increased 10+ ms on March 28
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Tracking, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: stephend, Assigned: cathleennscp)
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression, smoketest)
Tp increased 50+ ms after Hewitt's outliner to tree carpool. Btek is showing metrics in the 1260+ms, as opposed to the 1204-1214 before Joe's landing. http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=MozillaTinderboxAll&date=explicit&mindate=1017369900
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Keywords: perf,
regression
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
note that jkeizer also checked in a regression and backed it out after the hewitt checkin. So we got some of the time back, hewitt is the other part.
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Random notes: 1) I'm not sure how the tree conversion has affected pageload. I know that btek runs with a default new profile, sidebar open to bookmarks (a tree). I suppose the other visible tree is in the urlbar/autocomplete (well, not visible, but 'there'). 2) I'm kicking off jprof builds on Linux to be able to do some profiling and testing tomorrow (going home soon). 3) Note that files were copied (or moved) in the cvs repository, so backing out is, afaik, not a simple operation and will need help from leaf or seawood. 4) I've looked at the per-url times, and there is no standout page. The slowdown is across the board. (I'll attach a chart in a moment). Obviously the tree should not open tomorrow _for_any_reason_ until we either (a) have a fix checked in or (b) have backed this out while investigation continues (this conversion _must_ happen for mozilla1.0).
Severity: critical → blocker
A clobber brought the increase down to the 10-15ms range. See bug 134250 for why.
Summary: Tp increased 50+ ms after Hewitt's outliner to tree carpool. → Tp increased 10+ ms after Hewitt's outliner to tree carpool.
Actually, though, it was up higher already yesterday from earlier checkins. (jrgm said, I think, that the first run after a full rebuild tends to be slower. If that's the case, the 1215 is within the range for before hewitt landed, and none of the increase is related to his checkin, although we should wait a few more cycles to confirm that. The numbers were a bit more variable yesterday afternoon than they had been in the past.)
I don't think this can be blamed on hewitt. The Tp times from btek for March 28/29 that didn't have the messed up dependency problem caused by hewitt's changes (see bug 134250) (during which time the only thing that happened was jkeiser landed and then backed out) were: time Tp(ms) 3:51 1200 [March 28] 4:17 1197 4:57 1197 5:50 1198 6:24 1197 7:01 1199 7:35 1197 8:13 1199 8:55 1201 9:30 1200 10:05 1207 10:37 1197 11:15 1204 12:08 1199 12:39 1198 13:17 1206 (first build that took checkins) 14:55 1216 15:40 1205 16:22 1206 17:05 1214 17:44 1214 18:27 1203 9:50 1222 * [March 29] (clobber build - can be longer for some reason) 11:31 1215 12:14 1215 13:00 1215 13:36 1217 I think it's more important to look for the larger increase that may have happened earlier in the day, although there's a little too much variation to really tell.
Summary: Tp increased 10+ ms after Hewitt's outliner to tree carpool. → Tp increased 10+ ms on March 28
For kicks, here are some more data. I was curious to see if one of the things other than what we're measuring is more stable -- it doesn't seem like any of them are. However, here are the average average, average median (which is Tp), average cached load, and average uncached load times: AAvg AMed ACac AUnc mmdd-HHMM 1228 1197 1363 1195 0328-1037 1236 1204 1384 1199 0328-1115 1230 1199 1370 1195 0328-1208 1229 1198 1365 1195 0328-1239 1242 1206 1395 1204 0328-1317 1248 1216 1389 1210 0328-1455 1238 1205 1381 1203 0328-1540 1240 1206 1383 1204 0328-1622 1247 1214 1388 1212 0328-1705 1248 1214 1391 1212 0328-1744 1238 1203 1385 1201 0328-1827 1258 1222 1406 1221 0329-0950 1250 1215 1402 1213 0329-1131 1248 1215 1391 1213 0329-1214 1246 1215 1380 1213 0329-1300 1250 1217 1389 1216 0329-1336
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
So this isn't hewitt, it's holding the tree closed and it's still assigned to hewitt. We need to either open the tree, reassign this to someone that's responsible or back everyone out (besides hewitt) and get things moving again.
Cathleen took btek down and was investigating. Since we really should have btek up before we open the tree, and because cathleen was investigating, reassigning to cathleen.
Assignee: hewitt → cathleen
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
so this could either be due to bug 132329 or bug 133382. I would have backed out my patch, but btek doesn't pull right now, so I wouldn't be able to check how it affects Tp.
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
ok, so bug 132329 can't have caused it, I was told That leaves bug 133382... hm... it was already backed out once on tbox (at 23:14), but numbers don't show clearly if this fixed the regression or not
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Is this still blocking the tree from opening?
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
The tree has opened... Is this bug still relevant? If yes, shouldn't it be downgraded from smoketest blocker?
btek reboot at 03/30 19:59 seemed to give back over 10ms (I don't think any of the checkins around that time could have contributed: tests, OS/2, ftp, editorUtils.js to comply with API change and string properties), which brought us into the range of the old variation before hewitt's checkin. Later, after several checkins that may have affected perf numbers we are slightly (1ms avg) better than before hewitt's checkin. I am in favor of removing the smoketest keyword. Any objections?
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
Is this one still valid?
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
from the daily loadtime test results that I run, it looks to have been holding in the same range (1.29-1.35ms) for several months. http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/data/loadtimes/daily_loadtime.html
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
This bug is over 2 mo. old. I think we're hitting diminishing returns and need to wrap this one up. Cathleen or hewitt, any comments? Adding hewitt.
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
we should kill this bug - any objections?
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
I'm invalidating this bug. I think we figured out it was someone else. If not, and I'm incorrect, you know the drill.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•