1358378 - Testing / Sign Off / Approval Plan For Roll Forward of Lithium

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(support.mozilla.org - Lithium :: General, defect, P1)

Description

[Roland Tanglao needinfo please :rolandtanglao, :mohnkuchen, :adobo, :sinigang, :roland]

This tracker will track QA for the URL redirect solution from Lithium. It includes the following and more:

1. A test plan
2. QA by the Firefox team of the Firefox product including any manual and automated testing
3. QA by Lithium

Comment 1

[John Hesling [:John99] (NeedInfo me)]

(In reply to Roland Tanglao :rolandtanglao, :mohnkuchen, :adobo, :sinigang, :roland from comment #0)
> This tracker will track QA for the URL redirect solution from Lithium. It
> includes the following and more:
> 
> 1. A test plan
> 2. QA by the Firefox team of the Firefox product including any manual and
> automated testing
> 3. QA by Lithium

Is anyone going to verify the quality of the linked KB articles when displayed from products in Lithium as compared with how they display in Kitsune. 

Is that an important part of this move back to Lithium ensuring Lithium is not mangling the linked articles?
(For instance only some of the showfor bugs - Bug 1350856 - may get fixed before we move back   )


Is it an important part of this move back that help articles aimed at contributors and end users are helpful and accurate.
On Kitsune they are. 
As soon as we move back to Lithium some of the the Kitsune KB Articles may become inappropriate. 
We do not currently have a suitable set of contributor facing Lithium KnowledgeBase articles {Bug 1348891}. 
For instance we do not explain how to use the Lithium Knowledge Base & the procedures to keep the KB well maintained.

Comment 2

[John Hesling [:John99] (NeedInfo me)]

We clearly will not want to roll forward to a Lithium that has missing KB articles.
No point in fixing redirects but having missing KB articles.
See also bug 1360005 &  Bug 1370422