Closed
Bug 143180
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
MFCEmbed - "Match whole word only" in Find doesn't work
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Embedding: APIs, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 269442
People
(Reporter: amutch, Assigned: chak)
Details
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020508 BuildID: MFCEmbed - 5/8/2002 nightly build The "Match whole word only" option in the Find dialog does not work properly. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open any web page 2. Hit Ctrl-F to bring up the Find dialog 3. Check the option "Match whole word only" 4. Enter any sequence of chars that appear inside a word on the web page (eg., "stone" which appear inside the word "milestone") 5. Click on Find Next until your find ends "inside" the word (ie., until youf find the "stone" part of the word "milestone") Actual Results: MFCEmbed matches every instance of the word, even when it is inside a word. Expected Results: MFCEmbed should only match whole word matches of the word.
judging by bug 14871, this has never been implemented?
Summary: MFCEmbed - "Match whole word only" in Find doesn't work → MFCEmbed - "Match whole word only" in Find doesn't work
This has not been implemented in Mozilla. However, it is implemented in MFCEmbed so it affects embedding apps.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Cc:ing Conrad for additional info.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
A long time ago, embedding samples (not sure about MfcEmbed but this was true for PPEmbed) used a hand-rolled find impl that supported "entire word" searching. When everything was moved to nsIWebBrowserFind and the impl of that was changed, we lost the feature of "entire word" searching :-( It's in the nsIWebBrowserFind API, but it doesn't do anything. So, and this is why I cc'd akkana ;-), what we really need is to support entire word searching in the nsIWebBrowserFind impl.
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
I have an RFE for that, bug 14871. So far it hasn't been considered very high priority, so I haven't looked at it.
If this isn't going to be implemented soon or should be folder over into 14871, please let us know so that we can modify the dialog appropriately on our end (K-Meleon). The dialog in embedded examples should be modified as well but I'm more concerned with the timeline on the functionality versus the dialog display.
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
If you look at bug 14871, it's marked Future, and no one has suggested so far that it should be anything else. If you disagree with that, you should make a case for it in that bug.
I don't think there has been a big clamor for this but I just wanted to make sure I knew where this was going. Thanks for the clarification. I'll file a separate bug for the dialog box. This could be duped on 14871 or otherwise closed out. If the functionality is implemented down the road, it should apply equally to all apps.
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
duping per reporter's last comment *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14871 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•