Closed
Bug 149098
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Inconsistent layout for CSS tables
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Future
People
(Reporter: mythdraug, Assigned: karnaze)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
I have a 5x5 table, defined to be 640px by 480px. The first element in each row and col is defined to be 20% of the table. Occasionally, the table will be stretched one direction or the other. build: 2002060408 win32
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
It appears I can force the incorrect layout by changing the window's width. Correct layout can then be restored by reloading the page.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: Inconsistant layout for CSS tables → Inconsistent layout for CSS tables
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Re: Comment #3 From Quinn Yost (mythdraug) 2002-06-04 14:04 > It appears I can force the incorrect layout by changing the window's width. > Correct layout can then be restored by reloading the page. Confirming this: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020609
Updated•22 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
-> HTMLTables
Assignee: attinasi → karnaze
Component: Layout → HTMLTables
QA Contact: petersen → amar
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
BZ: While this is not as minimal a testcase as you requested, I did find what is likely the cause of the layout inconsistancy. table def: 640 x 480 px First element of each row is defined to have height 20% First element of each col is defined to have width 20% Cell 2.2 is rowspan 3, colspan 3, and (here's the likely culprit) 320 x 320 px.
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Umm... I can't reproduce this any longer with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020619
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
How do I tell when the layout is wrong with the minimal testcase? As a note, the original site now worksforme (build 2002-06-24-08) and I _did_ use to see the problem there...
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
While the testcase had layout problems, the original page had identical issues. However, I will agree that the layout of the page is now consistent. Marking WFM. It wasn't so much that the page didn't layout as I expected (my layout miscalculation), it was that it did so irregularly.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•