Closed
Bug 179056
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
"Check for new message every" stops after hibernate
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Backend, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: claudio, Assigned: emk)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.8.0.4, fixed1.8.1)
Attachments
(7 files, 3 obsolete files)
5.12 KB,
patch
|
roc
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.23 KB,
patch
|
emaijala+moz
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
907 bytes,
patch
|
sfraser_bugs
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
5.12 KB,
patch
|
emk
:
approval-branch-1.8.1+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
852 bytes,
patch
|
emk
:
review+
emk
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
811 bytes,
patch
|
emk
:
approval-branch-1.8.1+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
5.50 KB,
patch
|
dveditz
:
approval1.8.0.4+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
When resuming Windows from hibernate (on a laptop, HP Omnibook xe4500) Mozilla Mail does not check my IMAP account every 2 minutes as it does normally. I need to manually check mail one time and then the feature began to work properly. Using Mozilla 1.2b/en on a Windows 2000 SP3
Updated•22 years ago
|
QA Contact: gayatri → huang
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
This still happens on Thunderbird 0.3, Win2k SP4.
Hi Exactly the same on winxp sp1 + hotfixes mozilla 1.6 this is really annoying problem :(
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
I also have this problem on a win2k with Mozilla 1.7b using POP servers.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 on a Win2K laptop (2 POP servers).
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
bug 275727, bug 271183 and bug 179056 are dups. Can someone dup them and confirm one?
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 271183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This also affects Firefox and, I expect the browser component in Mozilla, in that Live Bookmarks are no longer refreshed every X seconds - as defined by browser.bookmarks.livemark_refresh_seconds - after hibernate/standby. Perhaps the Component field of this bug should be set to something more general?
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Can someone please dup bug 245471. Thanks
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Did some digging in lxr and filed two bugs: bug 282013 is slightly related. This bug should depend on bug 282014.
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 245471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 275727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
This behaviour is not only caused by hibernation, but by putting the PC to sleep too. Behaviour is still present in version 1.5 Beta 1 (20050908). It is very annoying for RSS feeds!
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12) > This behaviour is not only caused by hibernation, but by putting the PC to > sleep too. I don't see that with any version of TB, 1.0 or 1.5 or 1.6, under Windows 2000. Bug 179056 is about that situation. This bug is for hibernate only.
Summary: "Chek for new message every" stops after hibernate → "Check for new message every" stops after hibernate
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
Um, this is bug 179056. And I can confirm it happens with sleep as well on XP.
Comment 15•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14) > Um, this is bug 179056. Duh, so it is. It was bug 275727 that was originally opened for both hibernate and standby.
Comment 16•19 years ago
|
||
Bug 275727 was marked as a dupe of this one, so shouldn't sleep/standby issues be discussed here?
Comment 17•19 years ago
|
||
I can confirm that this bug is still present in Thunderbird 1.5 RC1. I have a few additional observations that I haven't seen discussed elsewhere -- perhaps somebody will find something useful in them: * In my experience, hibernate *usually* produces this problem, but not always. There seems to be a correlation between how long the computer hibernates and whether or not the problem occurs. Generally, if I hibernate for only an hour or two, Thunderbird works fine; however, if I hibernate overnight, Thunderbird won't check mail on schedule anymore. * After returning from hibernate, if I let Thunderbird sit long enough it will sometimes begin checking messages on schedule again. "Long enough" is occasionally only 20 minutes or so, but is usually several hours. I should note that I don't usually let Thunderbird sit long enough to "fix" itself -- if it doesn't work immediately I usually restart it pretty quickly -- so my experience with this is limited. * I also use Sunbird 0.2 and I have found that after returning from hibernate, if Thunderbird won't check email, Sunbird's alarm function also won't work. The two go hand-in-hand. Perhaps the bug lies in a common piece of code?
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
Well, it is a bit deeper. See my Comment #9; This Bug is dependent on Bug 282014. Unfortunately I don not have the right to set it dependent. Bug 282014 ist XPCOM - so _all_ Products have this Problem. You can eaven reproduce it with FF if you use some extension, which needs a timer. As you noticed right it got better, though.
Comment 19•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #18) > Bug 282014 > ist XPCOM - so _all_ Products have this Problem. You can eaven reproduce it > with FF if you use some extension, which needs a timer. Yes, Live Bookmarks (RSS feeds) stop updating in FF (and TB too I would think, but I don't use TB for RSS) after hibernate.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: mscott → nobody
QA Contact: huang
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•18 years ago
|
||
At present, wake/sleep notification is only implemented on Mac. They are not notified at all on other platforms. This patch implements them on Windows. A Japanese tester said this fixed the problem.
Assignee: nobody → VYV03354
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #212473 -
Flags: review?(emaijala)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•18 years ago
|
||
Requesting review to Simon who wrote and reviewed a patch for bug 197863.
Attachment #212474 -
Flags: review?(sfraser_bugs)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #212474 -
Flags: review?(sfraser_bugs) → review+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #212473 -
Flags: review?(emaijala) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: superreview?(bryner)
Comment 23•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 212472 [details] [diff] [review] implementing wake/sleep notification I think we'll want this for 1.8.1 (and possibly but less likely, 1.8.0.2, depending on schedule)
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?
Comment 24•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 212472 [details] [diff] [review] implementing wake/sleep notification Hm, is the message really dispatched to each window? That's unfortunate. I'm a little worried that we could have 0, or more than 1, invisible windows in some cases. roc would know better than me, can you ask him for review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: superreview?(bryner) → superreview?(roc)
I didn't know, but I checked the code and it seems pretty clear there's always exactly one hidden window.
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: superreview?(roc) → superreview+
Comment 26•18 years ago
|
||
checked-in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 282014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
No longer depends on: 282014
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•18 years ago
|
||
Bienvenu: AFAIK, approval‑branch‑1.8.1 flag needs a requestee. Asking Ere for approval because most of this patch belong to Win32: widget.
Attachment #213042 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?(emaijala)
Comment 29•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 213042 [details] [diff] [review] branch patch Sorry, I can't grant approval as I'm not a driver.
Attachment #213042 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?(emaijala) → approval-branch-1.8.1?
Comment 30•18 years ago
|
||
for the 1.8.1 branch, you just have to be a module owner
Comment 31•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 213042 [details] [diff] [review] branch patch Oh, good to know. Ok then..
Attachment #213042 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1? → approval-branch-1.8.1+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1? → approval-branch-1.8.1?(roc)
Comment on attachment 212472 [details] [diff] [review] implementing wake/sleep notification ere already approved this
Attachment #212472 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?(roc)
Comment 33•18 years ago
|
||
Kimura-san:
This patch cannot apply to 1.8 branch.
> patching file widget/src/windows/nsWindow.cpp
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 66.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 4167 (offset 182 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 4297 (offset 182 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file widget/src/windows/nsWindow.cpp.rej
> (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
> patching file widget/src/windows/nsWindow.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 262.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file widget/src/windows/nsWindow.h.rej
> (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
> patching file xpcom/threads/TimerThread.cpp
Assignee | ||
Comment 34•18 years ago
|
||
Oops, that was the same as trunk patch. Here is a correct one. I've confirmed this is not rejected. Carrying over branch approval (no actual code change).
Attachment #213042 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #213172 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1+
Comment 36•18 years ago
|
||
My MinGW headers don't have these PBT_ constants, do I need to update?
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #213179 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?(roc)
Comment on attachment 213178 [details] [diff] [review] fixing mingw bustage (trunk) +#else unnecessary.
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #213178 -
Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 213179 [details] [diff] [review] fixing mingw bustage (1.8 branch) but remove the #else.
Attachment #213179 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1?(roc) → approval-branch-1.8.1+
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #213178 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #213313 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #213313 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•18 years ago
|
||
Attachment #213179 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #213314 -
Flags: approval-branch-1.8.1+
Comment 43•18 years ago
|
||
checked-in to trunk and 1.8 branch.(fixed mingw bustage)
Comment 44•18 years ago
|
||
File : ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/.1/mozilla/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8.0/firefox-1.5.0.2.en-US.win32.zip 6721 KB 16/03/2006 17.26.00 has this patch? Where can I find first realeses with this patch?
Comment 45•18 years ago
|
||
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8 however, that's a pre-alpha build. I think it's reasonably stable but hasn't had much testing.
Comment 46•18 years ago
|
||
Last firefox 1.5.0.2 still has the problems to take forever to restore from hibernation and reach 100% CPU. I found interesting the description of bug 325384. It is about SeaMonkey but it is probably related with the long time to recover from standby.
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•18 years ago
|
||
Plaease consider landing this on 1.8.0 branch. This will fix some of (but not all) CPU 100% freeze after resore in bug 265172. And this is baked enough long on trunk and 1.8 branch.
Attachment #219440 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.3?
Comment 48•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 219440 [details] [diff] [review] 1.8.0 branch patch approved for 1.8.0 branch, a=dveditz for drivers. Please land soon!
Attachment #219440 -
Flags: approval1.8.0.3? → approval1.8.0.3+
Comment 49•18 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I am not familiar with Mozilla versions. What does "approved for 1.8.0 branch, a=dveditz for drivers." mean? Will I see this patch in the next 1.5.0.3 version? When will it be released?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•