Closed Bug 180291 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

OpenVMS build -> GNV: LDAP Changes

Categories

(Directory :: LDAP C SDK, defect)

DEC
OpenVMS
defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla1.3

People

(Reporter: colin, Assigned: mcs)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

This bug report will track the LDAP changes with the "move OpenVMS build to GNV"
work (meta-bug 180288).
Attached patch LDAP changesSplinter Review
Mark, could you start the review process please, and tell me how many levels of
review I need for LDAP modules. Thanks.
Yes, I will review these changes soon. At a glance I don't see anything risky
(not likely to break other platforms) with the possible exception of the
libldap/open.c change (I will have to look at that more closely).

As for the review process, the Mozilla client builds currently do not pick up
the LDAP code from the trunk; they pull from ldapcsdk_50_client_branch. If you
just want these changes on the trunk, I can review them. If you want them on the
LDAP branch that is used by the Mozilla client then we need a module owner
approval (from me), one review (which I will do), a superreview, and approval to
commit.
The open.c changes is inside an existing #ifdef VMS, so its not going to break
anyone else.

The changes need to go into ldapcsdk_50_client_branch, so that Mozilla picks
them up.

Once you're reviewed can you tell me who I should go to for superview and
checkin approval.

Many thanks.
Attachment #106353 - Flags: review?(mcs)
I REALLY need to get these changes in for OpenVMS, and I'd like to do so before
Thanksgiving. Its been 11 days since I posted the patch. If you can't review the
patch at this time, can you suggest someone else who can? I need to move
forward. Thanks, Colin.
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes

Sorry for the delay. r=mcs.
Attachment #106353 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #106353 - Flags: review?(mcs)
Attachment #106353 - Flags: review+
Attachment #106353 - Flags: superreview?
Thanks Mark. Should I just request the super-review from any of the usual gang,
or is there a preferred super-reviewer for ldap?
No preferred SR'r... I just posted a request to the newsgroup.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes

Looking for a superreviewer
Attachment #106353 - Flags: superreview?
This is blocking my work on Mozilla 1.3. Setting severity and milestone fields
according.
Severity: normal → blocker
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.3
making a non-specific super-review request probably isn't gonna do much good.
you're much more likely to get a response if you make the request of a specific
super-reviewer.
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes

Brendan, could you sr this please.
Attachment #106353 - Flags: superreview? → superreview?(brendan)
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes

rs=brendan@mozilla.org, cc'd seawood in case he has anything to add.

/be
Attachment #106353 - Flags: superreview?(brendan) → superreview+
Attachment #106353 - Flags: approval1.3a?
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes

a=asa for checkin to 1.3a
Attachment #106353 - Flags: approval1.3a? → approval1.3a+
Checked in to trunk.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Spam for bug 129472
QA Contact: nobody → nobody
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: