185307 - When I conducted the test at the url included it failed

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Description

[Mike]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

When I went to the following url:
http://mozilla.org/quality/ngdriver/suites/javascript/cbx007.html, to test
focus() First case checks whether focus method actually gives focus to the
checkbox or not. It failed.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the provided url and it won't pass
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
It says it returned true

Expected Results:  
It says it should have returned false

Comment 1

[R.K.Aa.]

reassign

Comment 2

[R.K.Aa.]

WFM, current trunk CVS, Linux:

Actual: true
Expected: true

Comment 3

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

wfm on Win2k as well (with 1.3a release).

Since the test is claiming that the correct return is "true" and comment 0 
says "Expected Results: It says it should have returned false", I presume that 
the test URL is incorrect?

Comment 4

[R.K.Aa.]

*** Bug 193650 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

From dupe:
Tested this site, somewhat strange: At first load it said test failed. I did
futher testing so i reloaded this site with Shift+Reload. Now the test failed, I
reloaded again and it worked. I repeated this 3 times, every time the same. Then
I did further reloading :), the test passed 4 times and then it failed. So the
test seems to work randomly for me (or not)...

Comment 6

[Johnny Stenback (:jst)]

Mass-reassigning bugs to [e-mail]

Comment 7

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

Reporter: Is this bug still present in a current build of Mozilla, since I can't
get this test to fail anymore?

Comment 8

[Georg Fischer]

when I click that URL (... cbx007.html) in Mozilla 1.2.1 and 1.3.1 (Win2K), it 
says "passed - true - true" in both versions.

Comment 9

[Frank Wein [:mcsmurf]]

no response-->resolving wfm (i also can't get this test failing anymore)