Closed
Bug 192903
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Posts to ignored threads sometimes fail to be marked read
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Networking: NNTP, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: smjg, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 This seems to happen mostly on the SpamCop newsgroups (news.spamcop.net server) for some reason. When everything seems to be marked read, it still shows a number of unread messages. Are they headers waiting to be downloaded? No, they're ignored posts that have slipped past the mechanism to automatically mark them read. Reproducible: Sometimes Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a newsgroup that has unread messages. 2. In Threads with Unread view, go through all the remaining unread threads ignoring them. 3. Press Get Msg. 4. Realise that's not the problem, so set view to Unread, Ignored Threads. Actual Results: 1. Newsgroup opens normally. 2. Once this is done, the newsgroup list still indicates unread messages. 3. No new messages in newsgroup, so unread count remains the same. 4. I see some unread, ignored threads. Expected Results: Already marked the posts to ignored threads as read when they came in, as it does normally.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Should've said "Open a newsgroup that has unread messages and ignored threads". But I guess that's kind of obvious.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
One of my 'groups had 1160 or so unread messages when I came in today. When I opened it and downloaded the headers, it cut down the count to 570 or so. But then I had to kill Mozilla thanks to bug 223597 again and not having time to wait. And of course, since a force quit loses all unread/read status information (I can't seem to find a bug number for this), the count was back to 1160 or so on restart. Bit since the headers were already downloaded, they hadn't re-passed through the ignored -> read filter. So this is probably one cause of this problem. But I'm sure it's not the only cause.
Summary: posts to ignored threads sometimes fail to be marked read → Posts to ignored threads sometimes fail to be marked read
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Still happening - 2005092710
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
sorry for the spam. making bugzilla reflect reality as I'm not working on these bugs. filter on FOOBARCHEESE to remove these in bulk.
Assignee: sspitzer → nobody
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
WFM version 2.0.0.6 (20070728) please reopen if you see otherwise
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•