Closed
Bug 197953
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Ability to sort table rows in the browser
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, enhancement)
Core
Layout: Tables
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 104639
People
(Reporter: pabs3, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.08 [en] (Win98; I ;Nav) Build Identifier: Where HTML tables are used as they should be, not for layout, a great thing would be the ability for the user to be able to right-click on a <th> and sort all the rows by that column. Tertiary sorting would probably be enough, but specifying arbitrary sortings would be good. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Goto http://docbook.org/wiki/moin.cgi/DocBookAuthoringTools 2.Wish you could sort by the free column, without editing the page 3.Think about reporting a bug Actual Results: I reported this bug Expected Results: Been an operating system
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
->Layout
Assignee: asa → table
Component: Browser-General → Layout: Tables
QA Contact: asa → madhur
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
This could be done, actually, with a simple add-on... not sure that this needs to be part of the default layout engine, however. CCing jesse, since I bet he has a bookmarklet for this or wants to write one. ;)
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Looks like a duplicate of bug 104639. Oh, and Jesse does already have a bookmarklet: http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/pagedata.html#sort_table *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 104639 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
That bookmarklet is cool, but can't sort according to multiple columns. Also I had thought of implementing it as an entry on a context menu + some tooltips for sort order feedback, instead of modifying the table. Either way is OK I guess, but I don't think adding another row is the right way to do it, rather the up/down things should be part of the header row, either before or after the cell content, maybe depending on the horz alignment.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•