Closed
Bug 200407
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Images disintegrate in horizontal bands when scrolling down
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: tipple.karl, Assigned: jdunn)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 On some web site, such as the pages listed above, I find that both the bottom most image on the left side (of the three) as well as the images at the top of the second URL (reached by clicking on "daily report" on first URL, always break up in horizontal bands when I scroll down the page so that the images disappear off the top of the screen momentarily. When I return, they are broken up. I have had this problem on various web sites with all versions of Mozilla except for 1.2.1. I have tried using both Java 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 and it makes no difference. I finally got the problem fixed on this computer by installing Mozilla 1.3 on top of 1.2.1 in its complete form; if I did a custome installation wherein I did not install chatzilla, etc., it would fail every time. It also failed everytime I installed by uninstalling 1.2.1 first! This computer uses an ATI Rage Fury Pro 32 MByte video card. I have found no way to install any version other than 1.2.1 and have it work on images properly on an HP computer that uses some nVidia card. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to listed URL. 2. Load it. 3. Scroll down page so that images disappear off top of window, and the scroll back up. Actual Results: Images are broken up in horizontal bands. Only way to fix is to reload page. Expected Results: Kept images intact while I scrolled down page and then back up. This problem was very evident in version 1.01 with the National Zoo Panda cam site, but it has changed and no longer seems to suffer the same problems. However, the fellow that introduced me to Mozilla had the same problems with the National Zoo site when he tried it. We both looked at the HTML and could see nothing wrong with it. I posted this query on a Mozilla-zine forum, and someone said they had heard the Netscape 6 had problems with some video cards. However, if this is true, it means there are problems because a browser that will not work right on images with all video cards is not much help . . . !
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
->imagelib
Assignee: asa → jdunn
Component: Browser-General → ImageLib
QA Contact: asa → tpreston
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Hi Karl I'm not able to reproduce your problem - are you able to confirm whether or not this is still happening, preferably with a recent build of Mozilla Thanks
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•