Open
Bug 200894
Opened 21 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
Responding to a message sets previous 'to' recipients as 'cc' recipients
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Composition, enhancement)
MailNews Core
Composition
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: olivier.vit, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 recipients change from 'to' to 'cc' when doing a reply to Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: You receive a message from A with B,C,D in 'to', and X,Y,Z in 'cc' You reply to this message Actual Results: Then only A is 'to' And all B,C,D,X,Y,Z become 'cc' Expected Results: Logically, the position of the recipients regarding the message and its purpose shouldn't change when you reply to the original message: B,C,D should stay as 'to'
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Still true with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507
Severity: enhancement → major
Summary: responding to a message set previous 'to' recipients as 'cc' recipients → Responding to a message sets previous 'to' recipients as 'cc' recipients
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
This is not a bug - most MUAs behave the same way AFAIK. Is you think about it, this is reasonable - the response is TO whomever wrote the original message and CC other recepients of the original message.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
I don't agree with comments #2 May be other MUA act this way, but the way people (like in large organisations or when multiple organisations are working together) are now distinguishing TO and CC implies that this quality of the relationship with the message is being preserved through the different replies. This is even more true when you happen you reply to a message you sent yourself: you don't want to set again by hand who is TO and who is CC, especially when you have 20 recipients or more Qualifiying as enhancement request at least ! PS : By extension, this should also taken into account in address book lists (who should to and cc by default), but it's another story !
Severity: major → enhancement
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Still a valid enhancement request
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: ducarroz → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 2000 → All
QA Contact: esther
Hardware: PC → All
Updated•16 years ago
|
QA Contact: composition
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > This is not a bug - most MUAs behave the same way AFAIK. Is you think about it, > this is reasonable - the response is TO whomever wrote the original message and > CC other recepients of the original message. are there specs on how this should behave?
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•