Closed
Bug 213442
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Marketing colleral + infrastructural issues
Categories
(Marketing :: General, task, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: chofmann, Assigned: rebron)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
10.21 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
links and attachments to all the presentations that we have developed to share with groups and organiziations... Topics like: -Who we are -Where we have been -Development Process -Success stories -where we are going (road map and snippets of ideas for the next round of roadmanp updates... asa do you have that sacarmento linux user group preso that you can attach or link to to get this started? brendan also has the foundation powerpoint that we worked up with IBM. over time we might want to split this off into sub bugs but for now this one might be enough..
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: myk → chofmann
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Updated•21 years ago
|
Summary: Marekting colleral tracking bug → Marketing colleral tracking bug
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
opening this bug and marking it P2. I want to make progress on this this month.
Group: Marketing Private
Priority: P1 → P2
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
background materials we'd like to develop: - slides overview - success stories - 3 year strategy/vision for Mozilla infrastructure pieces that are nice to have: - TAC up and running - Mozilla foundation europe / asia - Progress on the IE issue - Standards campaign
Summary: Marketing colleral tracking bug → Marketing colleral + infrastructural issues
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
a Why Mozilla document that outlines why enterprises should do business with us would also be great.
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Deployments page proposal by chofmann: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: http://mozilla.org/projects/deployments or similar Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:15:49 -0800 From: Chris Hofmann <chofmann@meer.net> To: Dawn Endico <endico@mozilla.org>, mscott@meer.net, David Bienvenu <bienvenu@nventure.com>, Brendan Eich <brendan@meer.net>, Bart Decrem <bart@decrem.com> CC: Mitchell Baker <mitchell@mozilla.org> Need to start developing a good home for the "deployment community" and related information -identify if there is a place that we could use now to start gathering docs and information --I did a quick search on deployment but nothing interesting came up. --I'd suggest establishing http://mozilla.org/projects/deployments and start organizing a collection of stuff there reference docs ---add the mcd doc about setting control mechanisms that beinvenu and mscott are working up for bms/doc savage ---listing of interesting controllable prefs ---installation customization doc http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpinstall/browser_xpi.html and others.... --- deployment news ---list of deployments as we start to find them and links to leads on deployments mentioned in the press http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=3909 start to create the public hall of fame list out of barts full contact spreadsheet. ---mozilla deployments in the news.. ---deployment success stories on the technical side. rational for mozilla deployment ---deployment success stories and references that also how to get a mozilla deployment project approved in your organization with white paper that outlines costs --rational for why deploying mozilla makes sense -reduced cost --lower cost per seat --avoid future lock in costs. --share development costs with other organizations that are deploying mozilla -additional control if you need it... you can own the source or pay others to work on it. increasing the support longevity... credibility -good open source track record on the project for continual innovative improvement and evolution v. abandonment and disruptive forced migration by major commercial software providers breath and depth of technology offerings can meet your needs now -cross platform -better security -more sound security architecture, default settings, and extensive code review and white hat testing -fly under the radar of the MS OS/security nightmare monoculture in the future -options for deploying the full suite, browser only, or mail only available now with Mozilla Zurich, and will improve with the introduction of Mozilla eZ and Mozilla thunderbird 1.0 versions ;-) -evolving into a full OS office stack with development and integration to calendar, Open Office ... ---links to pages and tracking bugs on other related projects and tasks as we find and update them-- calendar,.... ---links to newsgroup/mailing list for deployment questions, answers, and comments --also set up "deployments" newsgroup and mail alias for discussions if no one has heartburn over the selection of projects/deployments can you set this up dawn? thanks chris h.
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Bart, bugzilla screws up the line breaks. Can you or someone else do a HTML version? ;-)
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
It looks pretty readable on Firebird. The thing is, we can't just make a web page by doing a copy/paste job. Someone needs to take an hour or two to write this page. Daniel, do you have the time to do that?
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Brief review of attachment 136113 [details], subsection "Suggested Docs":
In general this document needs more focus at the
topic level. "Deployment" is not the same thing as
"technology uptake". The former is an engineering problem;
the later is a marketing problem. Which is to be the primary
focus of this document? Every document should have one central
message.
Similarly, case studies may be divided into technical
examples (engineering) and "success stories" (marketing).
If this document is to assist organisations who have already
chosen to uptake the technology, then the focus should be
an engineering one. If it is to persuade others to uptake
Mozilla, then it should be free of mechanical detail and
concentrate on making a technical and organisational case.
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
I'm confused. what does "technology uptake" mean?
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
"Technology uptake" is the process by which individuals or organisations add new complexity to their lives for perceived benefit. It is more general than installing a piece of software. Everytime you look at a new hammer in the hardware store you are poised at the moment when you might do some technology uptake. That also applies to taking up a mortgage (financial technology). So t.u. is "buying behaviour" not "using behaviour". It makes little sense to offer someone details on how to use a technology if they haven't yet decided if they even want it. People purchase on benefits, not on "howtos". Similarly, once a purchase decision is made, howtos become more important than benefits. In short, aim for the purchase stage your audience is at. Obviously, purchase does not necessarily mean exchange of money. It can be exchange of time/effort/loyalty.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: bart → rebron
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
Chris: Has there been further work on this to get it online?
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
www.mozilla.com/about
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•