Closed
Bug 220475
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Print Preview and Printing displays blank lines through gif image if scale not 100%
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jay, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Windows 98SE Mozilla Build 20030925 Bring up site, print preview or print and blank lines display across graphic.
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
W2k 20030925 The blank lines are not across the graphic because the original image consists of more parts. The different parts are only not merged in the print preview. If I set the scale in the print preview to 100% then its displayed right. All other options in the dropdown menu shows the disconnected parts. Can someone try to print it with 100% and see if there are any "white lines"?
I see this with Linux i686 build 2003082822 gcc-2.95.3 compiled, the blank parts are on the back of the books. And it prints out an empty second page. Seems this is OS=all.
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 220758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Changing the zoom to 100% in print preview will cause it to print sans blank lines. However, there is still a blank second page issue. And, the only way to have it print properly (no blank lines) is to use the print preview feature. Still prints with blank lines if file/print is selected.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Summary: Print Preview or Printing displays blank lines → Print Preview and Printing displays blank lines through gif image if scale not 100%
you can also see the effect at http://www.fordfinancial.com/interestadvantage/app.jhtml?cmd=PRINT&datFordEmp=No&datControlNum=EH-015
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: printing → nobody
QA Contact: printing
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
all the testcases are 404. if you have a testcase, please reopen
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Jay, are you saying comment 5 is saying the problem no longer existed at that time??
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
No, it no longer exists now. I don't think it should be marked as fixed because nobody actually fixed it? XP Pro SP3 - Firefox 4.01
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > No, it no longer exists now. I don't think it should be marked as fixed > because nobody actually fixed it? correct. I asked because in comment 8 you said "marking", but were not explicit that it in fact now works for you.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I thought that marking it WFM was self-explanatory - Works For Me which in fact it does.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•