Closed
Bug 221746
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Newsgroup posts or messages sent by me should be "read" by default, as soon as they are downloaded from NNTP server.
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Database, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: davidgrant, Assigned: Bienvenu)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030808 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030808 Newsgroup posts or messages sent by me should be "read" by default, as soon as they are downloaded from NNTP server. Sometimes I have zero unread messages in a certain newsgroup, then I write a message to that newsgroup. Later on, I noticed there is 1 unread message in that newsgroup, so I open that newsgroup and look to see who had answered my post. I then realize that no one has replied to my post, and that the unread post was the message I sent myself. Why is this classified as unread? Doesn't the act of writing that message involve reading it simultaneously? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Compose a message in a newsgroup 2. Click on Send and Receive 3. Notice that your message has arrived in the newsgroup. 4. It is unread 5. Ask yourself, "why?" Actual Results: The message that you just sent is unread. Expected Results: The message that you just sent should be unread, just like when you send email messages and they are set as "read" and moved to the Sent folder. I hope this isn't a dupe, I couldn't find it by searching, and it was challenging to think of keywords to search for this bug.
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
I vote wontfix. I want all my messages marked unread, so that I can easily use them to find threads I've participated in, and any responses to my own messages.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
I vote that there should be a preference for this. Even if it was just a hidden preference in prefs.js that would be fine.
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Why don't you all setup a filter to your taste?
Voting wontfix.
>Doesn't the act of writing that message involve
>reading it simultaneously?
No. it doesn't.
When client checks for number of unread posts it *does not* download the
headers, so there's no way to be sure that this 1 new post was just sent by you.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•