Closed
Bug 229234
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Update Mozilla 1.7 Bookmarks
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Bookmarks & History, defect)
SeaMonkey
Bookmarks & History
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 237340
mozilla1.7alpha
People
(Reporter: danielwang, Assigned: p_ch)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
4.07 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
not usre if 1.5 bookmarks ever makes it to 1.6 branch. Anyway, these URLs need to be updated: Support & Release Notes Set to blocker since we should have this in 1.6 release
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
1.6 is already released, so I assume this bug is INVALID. pi
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
gerv, it looks like change in bug 218326 is never ported to Mozilla 1.6 final. Can we keep a separate bookmark.html and have the installer script or whatever choose the right file?
Severity: blocker → normal
Summary: Update Mozilla 1.6 Bookmarks → Update Mozilla 1.7 Bookmarks
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Grr. That's annoying. We need to check the bookmark changes into the trunk. And perhaps the 1.6 branch too, if we are going to do another release. Just to summarise: the work of this bug is getting the user-oriented bookmarks file from 1.5 and checking it into the 1.7 trunk (primarily) and the 1.6 branch (secondarily.) That is what the blocker nomination relates to. Gerv
Severity: normal → blocker
Flags: blocking1.7a?
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.7alpha
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
changes from 1.4 bookmarks: removed hardcoded link to release notes releases/mozilla1.4/ updated support page to /support change /get-involved.html to about/get-involved.html removed ADD_DATE, LAST_CHARSET, etc. information www.dmoz.org -> dmoz.org (preferred address, see Home link in http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/advanced_search.html
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Daniel: why is your file based on the 1.4 bookmarks and not the new, user-friendly 1.5 bookmarks checked in under bug 218326? Gerv
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
no idea. The attachment is based on your file at bug 218326. btw, I'd like to see vivisimo.com listed under Search (I really miss Northernlight Search)
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Daniel: this one :-) Vivisimo have a Mozilla search plugin on their front page if you are using Mozilla, so I say we include them as a mutual back-scratching exercise. Gerv
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 140136 [details]
bookmarks.html
Asa: this is the same as the 1.5 bookmarks you reviewed before.
Gerv
Attachment #140136 -
Flags: review?(asa)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 51193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 115567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
can someone post a diff of the delta's between this file and the currently shipping file?
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
going to - this, we can take the change if it gets reviewed, but we probly won't hold the alpha for it.
Flags: blocking1.7a? → blocking1.7a-
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
Vivismo search and community/ page added Added the same Quick Searches in Firefox, except the URLs are converted to Javascript: so that they don't perform invalid searches when accessed from the Bookmarks menu.
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140136 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140136 -
Flags: review?(asa)
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 141283 [details]
bookmarks.html
Asa - is now an OK time to do this? If so, please review/approve.
Gerv
Attachment #141283 -
Flags: review?(asa)
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure Asa reads bugmail - has someone asked him about this? could someone else do the review? and, in response to chofmann's comment, it's not really worth having a diff - i just did it and the only significant line that matches is the doctype. there are a couple of sites from the old file with new labels, but pretty much all of the existing bookmarks are removed in favour of the new selection.
Flags: blocking1.7b?
Flags: blocking1.7?
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
looks like we did this in bug http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237340
Flags: blocking1.7b?
Flags: blocking1.7b-
Flags: blocking1.7?
Flags: blocking1.7-
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
Actually, that's quite a different set. For example, it's missing the useful QuickSearches and the range of search engines. Is anyone up for merging, in consultation with Asa, the best bits of the two? Gerv
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
well if anything further is going to be done, probably best to do it in the bug that overtook this one... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 237340 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #141283 -
Flags: review?(asa)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•