Closed
Bug 237784
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 1 month ago
It's impossible to load RDF files if they don't have the extension ".rdf"
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect)
Core Graveyard
RDF
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: Manuel.Spam, Assigned: mozilla)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
776 bytes,
application/x-zip-compressed
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 It's possible to write RDF-files without the extension ".rdf" without problems (it's possible to create datasources for empty or not existing files which don't have the extension ".rdf"). As soon as I want to get an datasource for an RDF-file without the ".rdf" extension, which contains data, I get the following error in javascript console: Fehler: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x804e03f3 [nsIRDFService.GetDataSourceBlocking]" nsresult: "0x804e03f3 (<unknown>)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://test/content/test.js :: testload :: line 4" data: no] Why can I write RDF-files with (for example) the extension ".dat" but can't open the data I've written? I don't see any reason for the limitation to this one extension. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Unzip the attached zipfile 2. edit the file-URL in the test code to the path where you've extracted the RDF file to. 3. Run the test code 4. Now you'll get an alert which displays the one item saved in the test RDF 5. rename the test.rdf to test.dat and change the file URL to the new file 6. Run test code again Actual Results: I get an error "<unknown>" in javascript console Expected Results: The RDF service should load the file without throwing this error.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
The RDFXMLDataSource just feeds the data to the parser, which is left to guess how to parse it. So the parser looks at the MIME type of the data, which it ends up having to get from the extension. Shouldn't the RDFXMLDataSource explicitly set the type hint on the channel (prior to calling Open())? See http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/netwerk/base/public/nsIChannel.idl#112
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Since we want to implement further serialisations of RDF, like N-Triples, there is no real way to say that we want to have XML/RDF. That this is ok for creating files comes from the fact that that throws an NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND very early in the game, and we never try to get the mimetype for that. I'm not really sure why the content sniffing doesn't get us text/xml though.
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Updated•15 years ago
|
QA Contact: rdf
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•