Closed
Bug 242926
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
WinXP 64Bit Edition (AMD64/IA64) support for mozilla/directory/c-sdk
Categories
(Directory :: LDAP C SDK, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: m_kato, Assigned: m_kato)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
3.65 KB,
patch
|
mcs
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 Currently mozilla/directory/c-sdk doesn't support WinXP 64 Bit (AMD64 / IA64). Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: mcs → m_kato
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Summary: WinXP 64Bit Edtion (AMD64/IA64) support for mozilla/directory/c-sdk → WinXP 64Bit Edition (AMD64/IA64) support for mozilla/directory/c-sdk
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
I am not an expert on IA64, but it seems to me that ia64 does not imply _WIN64. HP/UX for example runs on ia64 CPUs.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
There's a Windows 64 for Itanium which is not AMD Architecture. And Linux and Windows (AMD architecture) run on A64/Opteron.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #147889 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Any update to this? I note that the free MSVC + Platform SDK has support for intel 64bit and amd 64bit. I'm currently working on the windows build (using cygwin) so I might be able to sneak this in if you can test it.
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
At the moment, the code base for the Branch is broken for building on the PSDK. The breakage occured probably within the last six weeks as I tried building but it failed on something. I was planning on waiting for the final 1.5.0.1 source code before trying to isolate the problem to get it resolved so that a fix would be possible. I've also tried building with VS2005 but that, of course, has the same problems and some additional ones that are also in the 32-bit build on VS2005. I've been busy with Win32 stuff for a while.
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Any update on this?
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > Any update on this? What are you looking to do? Build on 1.5, 2.0 or later? I can build on 1.5 but I'm using VS2005 and the process requires a lot of pieces that have to be done by hand. I do plan to try building on 2.0 but am busy with debugging a Win32 problem right now.
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
I can probably get some fixes into the ldap c sdk configure/makefiles for this, but I don't have a Win64 machine to test with.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #169204 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #322259 -
Flags: superreview?(mcs)
Attachment #322259 -
Flags: review?(richm)
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 322259 [details] [diff] [review] patch for current trunk I do not have super reviewer status, but if the changes are just landing on the LDAP C SDK trunk, historically we have not required a super review. I do not know a lot about 64 bit Windows, but looking at NSPR's configure code they define USE_64 in a few places. Maybe the same thing should be done for the LDAP C SDK? See: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/nsprpub/configure.in#1648
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #322259 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #322259 -
Flags: superreview?(mcs)
Attachment #322259 -
Flags: review?(richm)
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
IA64 in the title should be changed to EM64T. IA64 is Intel's Itanium architecture. Intel's 64-bit x86 architecture is called EM64T.
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Looks ok to me.
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #332658 -
Flags: review?(mcs)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #332658 -
Flags: review?(mcs) → review+
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 332658 [details] [diff] [review] a patch v4 OK.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
checked in
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•