261705 - MAPI failure MAPIFindNext (Mozilla 1.6, 1.7 & Netscape 7 )

Status: RESOLVED EXPIRED

(MailNews Core :: Simple MAPI, defect)

Description

[R.K.]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

I don't get managed to read the inbox(es) of Mozilla with MAPIFindNext. Played
with lots of parameter variations, profile-names, NULLs, and all. MAPILogon (and
MAPISendMail work but MAPIFindNext always returns 2 (MAPI_E_FAILURE). 
(besides: when using Netscapes DLL MAPISendMail opens Mozillas Editor & Profile)

I tried with Netscape 4.72 (nsmapi.dll) and OutlookExpress (MSOE.dll):
MAPIFindNext works correct as intended!

Robert

############# Python 2.3 ##############

    def SyncInbox(self,cbMsg=None):
        from ctypes import c_ulong,c_char_p
        import win32com.mapi.mapi as wmapi
        mapi=ctypes.WinDLL(r"c:/Programme/mozilla.org/mozilla/mozMapi32.dll")
        print "MapiDllVersion", mapi.GetMapiDllVersion()
        #----
        shandle="    "
        profile=""
        pwd=""
        mapi.MAPILogon.argtypes = [c_ulong, c_char_p, c_char_p, c_ulong,
c_ulong, c_char_p]
        ret = mapi.MAPILogon(
                  0,  #ULONG ulUIParam,       
                  profile,  #LPTSTR lpszProfileName,   
                  pwd,  #LPTSTR lpszPassword,   
                  0,  #FLAGS flFlags,         
                  0,  #ULONG ulReserved,      
                  shandle
                )
        h = struct.unpack("i",shandle)[0]
        print "MAPILogon",ret,"H:[%s]"%h
        #-----
        msgid=" "*513
        MAPI_LONG_MSGID = 0x00004000
        MAPI_UNREAD_ONLY = 0x00000020
        mapi.MAPIFindNext.argtypes = [c_ulong, c_ulong, c_char_p, c_char_p,
c_ulong, c_ulong, c_char_p]
        ret = mapi.MAPIFindNext(
                  h,  #LHANDLE lhSession,        
                  0,  #ULONG ulUIParam,          
                  None, #0, #LPTSTR lpszMessageType,   
                  "NULL", #None, #LPTSTR lpszSeedMessageID,   
                  MAPI_LONG_MSGID|MAPI_UNREAD_ONLY, #FLAGS flFlags,            
                  0, #ULONG ulReserved,         
                  msgid, #LPTSTR lpszMessageID      
                )
        print "MAPIFindNext",ret,len(msgid), "[%s]"%msgid[:10]
        return ret,msgid

########### output:
>>> 
MapiDllVersion 94
MAPILogon 2 H:[538976288]
MAPIFindNext 2 513 [          ]
>>> 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1

[Stefan Borggraefe]

Robert: Why have you filed this bug when you already found bug 250757 before?
Isn't this bug just a duplicate of bug 250757?

Comment 2

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".

This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.

While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.

If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox:     http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey:   http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

Comment 3

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.