Closed
Bug 280201
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
RDF buglist with "inline" content disposition but also "filename" parameter gets downloaded
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: u115577, Assigned: justdave)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0 Set the appropriate MIME type for RDF - application/xml Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Click URL link above Actual Results: RDF file is downloaded. Expected Results: RDF file should be displayed in browser window.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Actually, the correct content-type is application/rdf+xml, which is exactly what we're using. Download behavior, however, would be controlled by the content-disposition header, which may possibly have problems. In fact, I think this was just recently fixed in Bugzilla... I will double-check.
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
You should use a trunk build : they support application/rdf+xml media type since Mozilla 1.8a3 (see bug 61839)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Bugzilla includes the correct content disposition header: Content-disposition: inline; filename=bugs-2005-02-03.rdf Mozilla MailNews has bug 229075 where the presence of the "filename" parameter causes the message part to be treated as an attachment rather than displayed inline. Firefox 1.0 may use the same code for handling the content disposition header and thus be subject to the same problem, but the latest nightly doesn't exhibit it, so the problem appears to have been fixed.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Component: Bugzilla: Other b.m.o Issues → Networking: HTTP
Product: mozilla.org → Core
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Summary: RDF buglist should not be downloaded → RDF buglist with "inline" content disposition but also "filename" parameter gets downloaded
Version: other → 1.0 Branch
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•