Open
Bug 293532
Opened 19 years ago
Updated 1 year ago
crlutil should not asserts when used with -i option and -n flag is not present
Categories
(NSS :: Tools, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: alvolkov.bgs, Unassigned)
Details
crlutil should extract cert nick name from modified crl. -n flag should not be a requirement when crltuil starts with -i flag. Currently crltuil asserts with the following stack with the parameters: -d . -M -i <file> -a -o <file> #0 0xffffe002 in ?? () #1 0x42028a73 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #2 0x401322fd in PR_Assert (s=0x805c1c0 "arena != NULL && certHandle != NULL && certNickName != NULL", file=0x805c0cf "crlutil.c", ln=0x13b) at ../../../../pr/src/io/prlog.c:538 #3 0x08050926 in DuplicateModCrl (arena=0x8099b80, certHandle=0x808ab10, cert=0xbfffed20, certNickName=0x0, inFile=0x8068488, decodeOptions=0x0, importOptions=0x0) at crlutil.c:315 #4 0x08051262 in GenerateCRL (certHandle=0x808ab10, certNickName=0x0, inCrlInitFile=0x8067eb0, inFile=0x8068488, outFileName=0x80684c8 "root_b64.crl", ascii=0x1, slotName=0x0, importOptions=0x0, alg=0x0, quiet=0x0, decodeOptions=0x0, url=0x0, pwdata=0xbfffed88, modifyFlag=0x1) at crlutil.c:627 #5 0x08052042 in main (argc=0x9, argv=0xbfffee64) at crlutil.c:988 #6 0x42015574 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Technically, crlutil would extract the issuer subject from the CRL in this case, not the cert nickname . It would then figure out the right signing cert to use .
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: bishakhabanerjee → jason.m.reid
Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: wtchang → alexei.volkov.bugs
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: jason.m.reid → tools
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → 3.12
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Unsetting target milestone in unresolved bugs whose targets have passed.
Target Milestone: 3.12 → ---
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee is inactive on Bugzilla, and this bug has priority 'P2'.
:beurdouche, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Assignee: alvolkov.bgs → nobody
Flags: needinfo?(bbeurdouche)
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
We have modified the bot to only consider P1 as high priority, so I'm cancelling the needinfo here.
Flags: needinfo?(bbeurdouche)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•