Closed
Bug 295589
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
getBBox() does not work when SVGLoad event is fired
Categories
(Core :: SVG, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 293581
People
(Reporter: plthompson2004, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: 1.8b2) Gecko/20050523 Firefox/1.0+ The file in the expected results area can be used to duplicate the problem. When you load the file in IE/ASVG3 and Squiggle, the 'click here' text is blue. When you load the file in Firefox/Moz, the 'click here' text is red and there is an exception shown in the JavaScript console indicating that the getBBox() call in the onload event handler caused an NS_ERROR_FAILURE. Here is some text from SVG 1.1 about the SVGLoad event: The event is triggered at the point at which the user agent has fully parsed the element and its descendants and is ready to act appropriately upon that element, such as being ready to render the element to the target device. getBBox() works. You can check that by clicking on the 'click here' text in any of the three SVG viewers mentioned above (the text changes to the x value of the bounding box). getBBox() just doesn't work in the SVGLoad event handler. Reproducible: Always Expected Results: 'click here' text should be blue, and no exception. <?xml version='1.0'?> <svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' width="500" height="400" onload="init (evt)"> <defs> <script> <![CDATA[ function init(evt) { var svgDoc = evt.target.ownerDocument; var element = svgDoc.getElementById('t1'); element.setAttribute('fill', 'red'); var bbox = element.getBBox(); element.setAttribute('fill', 'blue'); } function onClick(evt) { var element = evt.target; bbox = element.getBBox(); element.firstChild.nodeValue = "bbox.x = " + bbox.x; } ]]> </script> </defs> <g onclick="onClick(evt)" fill="green" font-size="18"> <text id="t1" x="20" y="100">click here</text> </g> </svg>
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
That's a duplicate of 293581.
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
indeed, duping *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 293581 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•