Closed
Bug 30549
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Scrollbar flies off into space when child movement inits scroll..
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: crawdad, Assigned: eric)
References
()
Details
If a child moves 'offscreen' of a overflow:scroll parent, clip occurs correctly but scroller fails to update in size. When this unsized scrollbar is shifted, it slides to extend beyond its container. Also, if child is then moved back to orig position(by clicking appropriate button in example), 1)parent does not reflow and 2)parent client-area becommes corrupt (different bug, I think...) This did not happen in the M-13 alpha release... This can be seen at http://www/w3cdom.com/ex_css2a.html. (I'm submitting this to 'layout' is this correct?)
This is a gfx scrollbar problem. If I look at the page using native scrollbars on NT, then it behaves as expected and the scrollbars work properly
Assignee: troy → evaughan
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Interesting re: native vs gfx scrollers... Native scrollers work okay. Gfx scrollers also cause the scrolling <div>'s border to be ignored in the example listed...
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
running 2000030913 on NT4... Scroller widget now updates correctly... but the div's border is still missing when gfx-scrollers are used (present when using native...)Is this a different big?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
FWIW: the "gfx makes border diasppear" seems to be bug #23806
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
reporter - are you still seeing this on new m15 builds? Seems to have been fixed. thanks
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
(First -- ignoring the prior reference to an unrelated bug which turns out to be bug #23806 "no borders on absolutely positioned, overflow:scroll divs") Second: for this bug -- the original report doesn't seem to apply anymore, but this does exhibit a nice testcase for bug #34218 "Scrollbar leaves traces of itself as it shrinks". marking as dupl and stealing modified testcase. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34218 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•